Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2021

POS0340\u2005VASCULAR IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY TAKAYASU ARTERITIS TREATED WITH TOCILIZUMAB: ANALYSIS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


In the TAKT study, a randomized controlled trial of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis (TAK) in Japan, the primary end point of time to relapse after induction of remission with glucocorticoid (GC) treatment showed a trend favoring TCZ over placebo (hazard ratio 0.41 [95.41% confidence interval, 0.15-1.10; p=0.0596]),1 but the double-blind period was too short for imaging evaluation.To independently evaluate vascular imaging in a post hoc analysis of radiographs from the TAKT study.Computed tomography images from patients in the TAKT study were evaluated by three independent radiologists who were not involved in the original trial. Patients who received TCZ and had computed tomography images available (n=28) were included. Assessments were made in 22 arteries for the change from baseline in wall thickness (primary end point), dilatation/aneurysm, stenosis/occlusion, or wall enhancement for at least 96 weeks after the start of tocilizumab treatment. Patient-level assessments were also conducted.Among 28 patients who received at least one dose of TCZ and for whom images were available, 86.7% of 22 arteries had improved/stable (no progression) wall thickness at week 96. The proportions of patients with no progressed, partially progressed, or newly progressed lesions were 57.1%, 10.7%, and 28.6% for wall thickness, and the proportions without progressed lesions were 92.9% for dilatation/aneurysm and 85.7% for stenosis/occlusion (Figure 1). Patients with newly progressed lesions, reflecting more refractory disease, were receiving glucocorticoid doses that could not be reduced below 0.1\u2009mg/kg/day at week 96.Approximately 60% of patients with TAK treated with tocilizumab did not experience progression in wall thickness. Few patients experienced progressive dilatation/aneurysm or stenosis/occlusion. Wall thickness progression likely resulted from refractory TAK. Patients who experience this should be monitored regularly by imaging, and additional glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive treatment should be considered to avoid vascular progression.[1]Nakaoka Y et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:348-354.Yoshikazu Nakaoka Consultant of: Roche/Genentech, Grant/research support from: Roche/Genentech, Masahiro Yanagawa Consultant of: Roche/Genentech, Akinori Hata Consultant of: Roche/Genentech, Katsuhisa Yamashita Employee of: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Norihiro Okada Employee of: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shinji Yamakido Employee of: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hiromitsu Hayashi Consultant of: Roche/Genentech, David Jayne Consultant of: Roche/Genentech, Grant/research support from: Roche/Genentech

Volume 80
Pages None
DOI 10.1136/ANNRHEUMDIS-2021-EULAR.2768
Language English
Journal Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Full Text