AB0199\u2005PLACEBO AND NOCEBO RESPONSES IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF NON-TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR BIOLOGICS AND JANUS KINASE INHIBITORS IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS SHOWING INSUFFICIENT RESPONSE TO TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR INHIBITORS: A META-ANALYSIS

Abstract

Placebo and nocebo responses have important consequences for the development of pharmaceutical drugs and the design of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). They can lead to the incorrect measurement of treatment-related efficacy and adverse effects (AEs).The goal of this study was to evaluate the frequency and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses in placebo-controlled RCTs of non-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) showing an insufficient response to TNF inhibitors.We performed a meta-analysis on the rates of placebo response, AEs, severe AEs (SAEs), and withdrawal owing to AEs in placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of non-TNF biologics and JAK inhibitors in patients with RA showing an insufficient response to TNF inhibitors.Nine RCTs contained a total of 3,442 patients (1,840 experimental subjects and 1,602 controls). The pooled incidence of an ACR20 response rate in placebo-treated patients was 22.1% (95% CI 16.4–29.1%) and 27.9% (95% CI 24.5–31.6%) in RCTs of non-TNF inhibitors and JAK inhibitors, respectively. A strong negative correlation was observed between drug efficacies (ACR20 response) and AE rates in the placebo arm, indicating that the greater the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response (r = -0.762, P = 0.017). A strong positive correlation was observed between drug efficacies (ACR20 response) in the placebo and active comparator, indicating that the greater the placebo response, the greater the treatment response (r = 0.737, P = 0.003). The pooled estimate in placebo-treated patients with at least one AE was 71.8% (95% CI 57.4–82.7%) and 58.7% (95% CI 52.8–64.3%) in RCTs of non-TNF inhibitors and JAK inhibitors, respectively. The pooled estimate in placebo-treated patients who withdrew from treatment owing to an AE was 3.8% (95% CI 2.7–5.3%) and 4.0% (95% CI 2.7–6.0%) in RCTs of non-TNF inhibitors and JAK inhibitors, respectively. A strong positive correlation was observed between AE rates in the placebo and active arms, indicating that the greater the nocebo response, the stronger the AE rate in the active arm (r = 0.855, P = 0.003).The frequency of the placebo and nocebo responses was 22.1% vs. 27.9% and 71.8% vs. 58.7% in placebo-controlled RCTs of non-TNF inhibitors and JAK inhibitors for RA, respectively, and the greater the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response and the greater the efficacy.[1]Mitsikostas DD, Chalarakis NG, Mantonakis LI, Delicha EM, Sfikakis PP. Nocebo in fibromyalgia: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials and implications for practice. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:672-80.[2]Kravvariti E, Kitas GD, Mitsikostas DD, Sfikakis PP. Nocebos in rheumatology: emerging concepts and their implications for clinical practice. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2018;14:727-40.[3]Colloca L, Barsky AJ. Placebo and Nocebo Effects. N Engl J Med 2020;382:554-61.None declared