AB0835\u2005IS BASELINE VITAMIN D STATUS RELATED WITH THE RESPONSE TO BDMARDS IN SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS?

Abstract

Vitamin D is thought to have an important role in immune regulation and is being subject of research in several autoimmune diseases. Some data suggest that vitamin D deficiency is common in Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and may be associated with disease activity and structural damage.To evaluate if there is a relation between baseline vitamin D status and the response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in a SpA monocentric cohort.Retrospective study including all the SpA patients (ASAS classification criteria) followed at our Rheumatology Department, registered in the national database and treated with bDMARD between June 2008 and July 2020. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data (including 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25-OHvitD]) at baseline and disease activity measures at 6 and 12 months of treatment with the first bDMARD were collected. Correlations between variables were evaluated by Spearman rank test, Mann-Whitney U test was used to the comparison analysis between groups and univariate logistic regression was used in the prediction analysis.A total of 195 SpA patients were included: 103 (52.8%) females, 47 (24.1%) smokers and 91 (46.7%) HLA-B27 positive; 139 (71.3%) had Ankylosing Spondylitis, 18 (9.2%) had Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated SpA and 38 (19.5%) had Undifferentiated SpA. At the time of the first bDMARD, the mean age was 43.5 years (±9.6) and the median disease duration was 12.4 years (0.7-52.7). The mean ASDAS-CPR (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein) was 3.9 (±0.8) and, in addition, 61 (31.3%) patients had 25-OHvitD levels below 30\u2009ng/mL and 12 (6.2%) had 25-OHvitD levels below 20\u2009ng/mL. Fifty-three patients (27.2%) were taking NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), 77 (39.5%) were under csDMARDs (conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs). Adalimumab (56%) and golimumab (33.3%) were the most frequently initiated bDMARDs in the first line.There were no statistically significant correlations between baseline 25-OHvitD levels and ASDAS-CRP at 6 (r=0.031; p=0.714) and 12 months (r=0.035; p=0.672) of bDMARD.In the subgroup analysis: there were no statistically significant differences in the response to bDMARD at 6 and 12 months evaluated by ASDAS response and ASAS 20, 40 and 70 responses according to the baseline 25-OHvitD levels (25-OHvitD <20ng/mL vs ≥20ng/mL; 25-OHvitD <30ng/mL vs ≥30ng/mL); and there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline 25-OHvitD levels at baseline according to the response to bDMARD at 6 and 12 months of bDMARD (ASDAS: no response vs clinically important improvement or major improvement; ASAS 20: no response vs response).In the line of these previous results, baseline 25-OHvitD levels did not predict the ASDAS response at 6 (OR 0.97 [0.95-1.00], 95% CI) or 12 (OR 0.98 [0.95-1.01], 95% CI) months of bDMARD.Despite some data that suggest that lower levels of 25-OHvitD may be associated with higher disease activity in SpA, our results failed to demonstrate that the baseline 25-OHvitD levels can be related or predict treatment response after 6 and/or 12 months of therapy with the first bDMARD in real-life SpA patients.None declared