Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2021

Correspondence on ‘Historically controlled comparison of glucocorticoids with or without tocilizumab versus supportive care only in patients with COVID-19-associated cytokine storm syndrome: results of the CHIC study’

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


As pointed out by Ramiro et al in the September issue of the Annals, trials and observational studies investigated numerous drugs against SARSCov2 and glucocorticoids proved effective in reducing the mortality among hospitalised patients with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support. 3 At first, based on the negative data in SARS and other viral infections, the WHO advised against glucocorticoids in COVID-19. However, up to 20% of patients with COVID-19 develop a hyperinflammatory status resembling a cytokine release syndrome with a severe respiratory deterioration and a higher mortality, thus possibly benefiting from glucocorticoids and antiinterleukin biologics. The CHIC trial showed that a course of highdose methylprednisolone, followed by Interleukins (IL)-6 receptor antagonist, accelerated respiratory recovery, lowered hospital mortality and reduced the likelihood of invasive mechanical ventilation in COVID-19associated cytokine storm syndrome defined by C reactive protein >100 mg/L, serum ferritin >900 μg/L on one occasion or a twofold increase within 48 hours, and Ddimer level >1500 μg/L. The RECOVERY trial, whose results were released in June 2020, showed that glucocorticoids were effective in reducing the mortality among severe hospitalised patients with COVID-19 needing invasive ventilatory support. Subsequently, a prospective metaanalysis including the RECOVERY and other six trials (1703 patients) concluded that dexamethasone 6 mg intravenously for up to 10 days, compared with usual care or placebo, led to a lower 28day allcause mortality without differences in serious adverse events. More recently, another metaanalysis including 73 studies and 21 350 patients with COVID-19 confirmed a mortality benefit with glucocorticoid only in severely ill patients with COVID-19 (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.83; p=0.0006) (8mg/kg body weight) single infusion. Based on the growing evidence, the WHO issued a strong recommendation for glucocorticoids (dexamethasone 6 mg/ day or hydrocortisone 50 mg intravenously/every 8 hours for 7–10 days) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 requiring oxygen and a conditional recommendation against the use of glucocorticoids in patients with a nonsevere infection (https:// www. idsociety. org/ practiceguideline/ covid19guidelinetreatmentandmanagement/# toc-5 (accessed 30 Sept 2020)). The available data, in fact, suggest that glucocorticoids in the early COVID-19 phases (<7 days from respiratory symptoms), in milder forms of disease (SOFA Score <7 or not requiring oxygen therapy or with C reactive protein <100 mg/L) or at higher doses (>150 mg hydrocortisone equivalent), may be harmful by favouring the virus evasion of immune surveillance or virus clearance while higher doses may prove immunosuppressive rather than antiinflammatory. Nevertheless, oral glucocorticoids have begun to be prescribed to patients positive for SARSCoV2 without respiratory failure in the homecare setting in order to prevent hospitalisation. Data discouraging glucocorticoids to prevent hospitalisation and respiratory worsening have been indirectly gathered from patients with rheumatic diseasesin which the use of prednisone ≥10 mg/day prior to SARSCoV2 infection was associated with a higher risk of hospitalisation. In this cohort most patients had rheumatoid arthritis in remission, thus suggesting that disease activity did not influence the observation. Based on our experience in a highimpact area, we analysed 1171 consecutive patients positive for SARSCoV-2, presenting at our emergency department between September 15 and December 15 in 2020, based on the outcomes: that is, discharged versus admitted and on the prior use of oral glucocorticoids (table 1). Of the 385 (31%) discharged patients, 27 (8%) had been on oral glucocorticoids for at least 3 days prior to emergency evaluation compared with 522 (66%) of the patients who required hospital admission (p<0.001 χ; raw OR: 26.2, 95% CI: 17.3 to 39.8). Among hospitalised patients, the overall mortality was not different based on the use of glucocorticoids prior to admission (20% vs 18% not taking glucocorticoids), thus reducing the possibility of a selection bias for which only patients with a more severe disease prior to admission had received glucocorticoids. Despite current medical recommendations do not encourage the use of glucocorticoids for the home management of patients positive for SARSCoV-2, a significant number of patients are prescribed with glucocorticoids in domiciliary setting without a beneficial effect in preventing hospitalisation. Based on the rheumatologic experience and our own series, we strongly advise against the widespread use of glucocorticoids in the homecare setting to prevent hospitalisation; the potential risks may significantly outweigh the unclear benefit in the absence of randomised trials.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220044
Language English
Journal Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Full Text