Clinical Cancer Research | 2021

Relevance of Molecular Groups in Children with Newly Diagnosed Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor: Results from Prospective St. Jude Multi-institutional Trials

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Purpose: Report relevance of molecular groups to clinicopathologic features, germline SMARCB1/SMARCA4 alterations (GLA), and survival of children with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) treated in two multi-institutional clinical trials. Materials and Methods: Seventy-four participants with newly diagnosed ATRT were treated in two trials: infants (SJYC07: age < 3 years; n = 52) and children (SJMB03: age 3–21 years; n = 22), using surgery, conventional chemotherapy (infants), or dose-dense chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (children), and age- and risk-adapted radiotherapy [focal (infants) and craniospinal (CSI; children)]. Molecular groups ATRT-MYC (MYC), ATRT-SHH (SHH), and ATRT-TYR (TYR) were determined from tumor DNA methylation profiles. Results: Twenty-four participants (32%) were alive at time of analysis at a median follow-up of 8.4 years (range, 3.1–14.1 years). Methylation profiling classified 64 ATRTs as TYR (n = 21), SHH (n = 30), and MYC (n = 13), SHH group being associated with metastatic disease. Among infants, TYR group had the best overall survival (OS; P = 0.02). However, outcomes did not differ by molecular groups among infants with nonmetastatic (M0) disease. Children with M0 disease and <1.5 cm2 residual tumor had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 72.7 ± 12.7% and OS of 81.8 ± 11%. Infants with M0 disease had a 5-year PFS of 39.1 ± 11.5% and OS of 51.8 ± 12%. Those with metastases fared poorly [5-year OS 25 ± 12.5% (children) and 0% (infants)]. SMARCB1 GLAs were not associated with PFS. Conclusions: Among infants, those with ATRT-TYR had the best OS. ATRT-SHH was associated with metastases and consequently with inferior outcomes. Children with nonmetastatic ATRT benefit from postoperative CSI and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Volume 27
Pages 2879 - 2889
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4731
Language English
Journal Clinical Cancer Research

Full Text