Abstract GS4-03: Neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense paclitaxel followed by dose-dense EC in high risk HR+/HER2- early BC by: Results from the neoadjuvant part of ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial

Abstract

Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved outcome in patients with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) but the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in early HR+/HER2- BC remains controversial. Oncotype DX / Recurrence Score (RS) and dynamic Ki67 response after short preoperative endocrine therapy are potentially predictive for pCR. Still, no prospective data are available so far to predict chemotherapy efficacy in this key patient group. Use of dose-dense chemotherapy is associated with improved outcome in meta-analysis, but its use in the neoadjuvant setting is less studied. Furthermore, use of nab-paclitaxel instead of solvent-based paclitaxel has shown promising results in some studies. Here, we present for the first time data from a randomized prospective trial comparing these risk-selection strategies according to RS and Ki67 decrease in high-risk HR+/HER2- BC. Methods: High-risk BC patients [cN0-1 with RS>25 or (RS 12-25 AND (centrally measured) post-endocrine Ki67 >10%] OR [cN2-3 status] OR [G3 AND Ki67>40%] were randomized to (neo)adjuvant 4x paclitaxel175 q2w or 8xnab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2q1w followed by 4x E90C600 q2w. pCR was defined as no invasive tumor in breast and lymph nodes. Results: 858 patients with available surgery data randomized to neoadjuvant Pac-EC (N=423) or nab-Pac-EC (N=435) were analyzed. Median age was 51 years; median RS was 30 (N=572); 34% had node-positive; 46% (locally) G3 tumors. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between study arms. Patients receiving nab-Pac-EC had higher pCR than those with Pac-EC (20.3% vs. 12.3%, p=.002); patients with RS 25 (6.5% vs. 15.8%, p=.003). The association of RS with pCR appeared more pronounced in premenopausal women, but a test of interaction was not significant; RS was about 3 points higher (mean 32.9 vs. 29.8, p 25 and nab-Pac-EC. Further details and data including impacts of Ki67 dynamics and additional markers on pCR will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Use of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel instead of solvent-based paclitaxel appears promising within a short (16-weeks) dose-dense chemotherapy schedule in high-risk HR+/HER2- BC. For the first time, data from a large neoadjuvant randomized trial confirm RS could help to select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC). Citation Format: Sherko Kuemmel, Oleg Gluz, Ulrike Nitz, Michael Braun, Matthias Christgen, Kerstin Luedtke-Heckenkamp, Raquel von Schumann, Maren Darsow, Helmut Forstbauer, Jochem Potenberg, Eva-Maria Grischke, Bahriye Aktas, Claudia Schumacher, Ronald Kates, Monika Graeser, Rachel Wuerstlein, Christoph Uleer, Michael Hauptmann, Steve Shak, Rick Baehner, Hans Kreipe, Nadia Harbeck, West German Study Group. Neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense paclitaxel followed by dose-dense EC in high risk HR+/HER2- early BC by: Results from the neoadjuvant part of ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-03.