Cancer Research | 2019

Abstract P4-16-04: Oral ibandronate for osteopenic breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: secondary 5-year survival outcomes analysis of the single-center phase 2 BONADIUV trial

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background. Several randomized trials demonstrated aromatase inhibitors (AI) superiority in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) compared to tamoxifen treatment for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) patients. Anyway, AI toxicity profile is a concern due to estrogen suppression. Pivotal trials demonstrated a significant bone mineral density (BMD) loss due to AI, with a consistent 5-year risk of bone fractures, thus impacting on patients9 quality of life. Bisphosphonates represent an effective treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis fractures prevention. However, an adequate patient9s selection for adjuvant bisphosphonates treatment during AI endocrine therapy is still a challenge. Final results of BONADIUV trial presented at San Antonio Breast cancer Symposium in 2016 showed that treatment with ibandronate, as compared to placebo, significantly improved BMD change in osteopenic women treated with adjuvant AI, and consistently protected patients9 bone loss. We present the secondary 5-year analysis on survival outcomes of the trial. Patients and methods. The BONADIUV trial is a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study designed to evaluate the impact of ibandronate treatment on BMD in osteopenic women taking AI. Between January 2011 and May 2014, 171 osteopenic patients (lumbar spine [LS] and/or trochanter -1 Results. At the database cutoff time for the present analysis on May 4, 2018, median follow up was 63.3 months (mean 61.2; range 2.7-87.3) for whole series, 64.9 months (range 33.8-84.0) for the placebo arm, and 62.2 months (range 24.2-87.3) for the ibandronate arm. Ten patients in the placebo group and 17 patients in the ibandronate group withdrew the allocated arm before any follow up data collection, and so were excluded from the analysis, performed on 144 patients (72 patients per arm). At the database cutoff time, the OS rate was 97.2% in the placebo group and 100% in the ibandronate arm. We observed four loco-regional relapse (three in the placebo arm, one in the ibandronate arm; p=0.33), three distant metastases (none in the placebo arm, three in the ibandronate arm; p=0.075), and three contralateral BC (one in the placebo arm, two in the ibandronate arm; p=0.65). The number of iDFS events did not differ between groups: four in the placebo group and six in the ibandronate group (p=0.56). Up to data cutoff, two deaths have occurred; none in the placebo arm and two in the ibandronate arm (p=0.15). The OS rate did not differ between arms. Conclusions. The secondary analysis of survival outcomes showed no difference between arms in terms of OS and iDFS rates. Further large investigations and mature follow-up from the published ones are awaited. Citation Format: Meattini I, Scotti V, Desideri I, Saieva C, Visani L, Salvestrini V, Cecchini S, De Feo ML, Mariotti M, Olmetto E, Delli Paoli C, Francolini G, Bernini M, Orzalesi L, Sanchez L, Nori J, Bianchi S, Livi L. Oral ibandronate for osteopenic breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: secondary 5-year survival outcomes analysis of the single-center phase 2 BONADIUV trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-04.

Volume 79
Pages None
DOI 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-16-04
Language English
Journal Cancer Research

Full Text