Abstract P375: Cortical Venous Opacification Patterns and Outcome in Patients With Tandem Carotid Occlusion - Results From the ESCAPE NA1-Trial

Abstract

\n Background:\n The degree of cortical venous opacification could reflect the degree of ischemia in tandem occlusions strokes. We assessed the association between asymmetric cortical vein opacification and outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke and tandem occlusion.\n \n \n Methods:\n ESCAPE NA1 was a multicenter randomized-controlled trial comparing medical treatments nerinetide vs. placebo in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT. Tandem carotid occlusion was defined as complete occlusion of the ICA on catheter angiography. We assessed cortical venous opacification on baseline CTA using the COVES score (Jansen, et al. Radiology 2019, ranging from 0-6 with lower numbers indicating poor cortical venous filling, and dichotomized to 0 vs. 1-6). The influence of cortical venous opacification on functional outcome was analyzed using regression modelling with adjustment for age, baseline NIHSS and ASPECTS, thrombolysis and treatment allocation.\n \n \n Results:\n We assessed 115 patients with tandem occlusion. Median COVES score was 2 (IQR 1-3) with 9 patients (8%) scoring 0 (complete absence of cortical venous filling). Patients with COVES 0 were less likely to have good leptomeningeal collaterals (good collaterals: COVES 0: 0/9 (0%) vs. COVES 1-6: 19/102 (18%), p = 0.007). Patients with COVES 0 were less likely to achieve good outcome (mRS 0-2, COVES 0: 3/9 patients (33%) vs. COVES 1-6: 79/106 (74%), p=0.016). Cortical venous filling was significantly associated with good functional outcome on univariable analysis (OR 5.9, 95%CI 1.4 - 25.0), and after adjustment for baseline variables (OR 8.6, 95%CI 1.4 - 51.0). Cervical carotid angioplasty and/or stenting did not modify functional outcome after adjustment for COVES score.\n \n \n Conclusion:\n Impaired venous drainage is a marker of poor pial collaterals and is associated with poorer outcome in tandem occlusion patients.\n \n \n \n