Before the First Breath: Prenatal Ultrafine Particulate Exposure and Incident Asthma

Abstract

Air pollution policy has long focused on protecting the most vulnerable (1), and who could be more vulnerable than a developing fetus who has yet to take a breath? Although they have yet to breathe contaminated air, the impact of prenatal exposure to multiple air pollutants on subsequent respiratory health in children has been well documented (2). Although we regulate fine particulate matter at the 2.5-mm cutoff (particulate matter<2.5 mm in aerodynamic diameter [PM2.5]), the effects of prenatal exposure to PM2.5 on subsequent respiratory health are inconsistent. Wright and colleagues found a potential critical window of susceptibility of prenatal exposure to PM2.5 among boys coexposed to high levels of maternal stress and also found that oxidative stress is likely the primary mechanism (3). However, ultrafine particles (UFPs;,0.1mm) are more likely to be associated with systemic inflammation and oxidative stress and are more likely to cross the lung barrier and be in systemic circulation (4). Black carbon particles, which are typically ultrafine, can even accumulate on the fetal side of placenta (5). Despite the potential impacts of UFPs on sensitive populations, only the European Union regulates UFPs, albeit only filterable UFPs .23 nm from vehicles (6), and there are no policies in occupational settings (7). Although there is growing evidence from animal studies on the effects of in uteroUFP exposure on development and subsequent disease (8), there have been relatively few studies in humans (9). In this issue of the Journal, Wright and colleagues (pp. 788–796) add to this weight of evidence with the first analysis of prenatal UFP exposure and incident asthma in a prospective birth cohort in the United States (10). They determined that for females there is a critical window of susceptibility during the third trimester when UFPs more strongly impact incident asthma (odds ratio [OR], 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47–15.7), whereas for males, increased UFP exposure at any time during gestation was associated with similarly lower risk (third trimester OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.23–7. 36). More generally, they found that UFP exposure across pregnancy greatly increased the risk of asthma for both males (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.55–7.06) and females (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.15–5.11). One of the strengths of this study is the well-validated daily estimates of UFP, nitrogen dioxide, PM2.5, and temperature exposure for the entire gestation period at such a low resolution (20 m). In the only previous birth cohort analysis of UFPs, which was conducted in Canada (11), estimates were at the city block resolution, likely introducing exposure misclassification for such highly localized pollutants. Of particular interest is Wright and colleagues’ finding that UFPs and PM2.5 are not associated with each other, and that UFPs are better correlated with local sources, including vehicular traffic. This provides additional evidentiary support that PM2.5 legislation offers reduced protection to this vulnerable population from traffic-related air pollution (12) and that policy must directly address reducing UFPs or at least not inadvertently increasing them (e.g., increased fuel efficiency may create more UFPs [13]). Another strength of this study is the use of Bayesian distributed lag interaction models, which provide an elegant tool for identifying critical windows of susceptibility for in uteroUFP exposure, and if these varied by sex. For example, UFP exposures betweenWeeks 28 and 35 were associated with significantly more incidents of asthma among females. Although UFP exposures within the first year of life were not associated with incidence of asthma in these cohorts, it will also be important for future studies to perform analyses to determine if there are other critical windows of susceptibility during periods of postnatal development for exposure to UFPs, such as the alveolarization process or puberty, when interactions with hormones may be important. Although the findings in this report are compelling, the average age of asthma diagnosis was 3.6 years. Many children who have wheezing episodes before age 3 years do not continue to wheeze (14), and it will be important to assess if these in utero exposures are associated with the development of persistent asthma in these cohorts as they age. This analysis uses data from two cohorts—ACCESS (Asthma Coalition on Community, Environment and Social Stress) and PRISM (Programming of Intergenerational Stress Mechanisms)—yet only 376 of 1,379 total dyads (27%) were included, with limited explanation of exclusion criteria. This subsample had younger mothers who were more likely to self-identify as Black than in the overall cohorts. Both of these characteristics are associated with increased susceptibility of air pollution exposures in other cohorts (15). However, both these cohorts only included infants that were .37 weeks gestation, and the PRISM cohort excluded mothers who drank>7 alcoholic drinks per week before pregnancy. Thus, these may be relatively healthy cohorts and this bias may result in underestimating the effects of in uteroUFP exposure in the general population. For example, children with the highest UFP prenatal exposures may have been more likely to be born before 37 weeks (9). Although the study adjusts for tobacco smoke exposure, future studies should account for e-cigarette exposures, which contain more nanosized particles andmay confound the relationship with ambient UFPs (16). The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has underscored the systemic health inequities in the United States. Many of the regions most impacted by the pandemic are regions that already have markedly more traffic-related air pollution. Although more research is needed to better characterize inequities of UFP This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0. For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern.