Maturation of arteriovenous fistulas in patients with ventricular assist devices

Abstract

Objective: Postoperative renal dysfunction necessitating hemodialysis after implantation of ventricular assist devices presents a challenge with respect to establishment of hemodialysis access. Lack of pulsatile flow has led to concerns that arteriovenous fistulas will not mature. This study aims to evaluate arteriovenous fistula as a method of hemodialysis. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent implantation of a ventricular assist device between 1988 and 2016 with a subsequent need for hemodialysis were identified. Retrospective data were collected for patients requiring hemodialysis through an arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft. Access flow rates and duration of patency are reported. Results: Sixty-four patients were identified (10 required long-term hemodialysis, 5 via arteriovenous fistula, 1 via arteriovenous graft). All six patients receiving long-term hemodialysis access were on continuous-flow ventricular assist devices. Brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas were performed in all arteriovenous fistula patients, and the average preoperative vein diameter was 4.1\u2009±\u20090.9\u2009mm. On 30-day follow-up, the average flow rate was 1262\u2009±\u2009643\u2009mL/min (880–2220). In arteriovenous fistula patients, one died at 30\u2009days, one arteriovenous fistula required ligation for steal syndrome at 5\u2009months, and one was abandoned after 10.7\u2009months for low flow. Of remaining fistulas, one was converted to an arteriovenous graft at 1.7\u2009years for malfunction (with 5.3\u2009month patency), and one remains open at 4.0\u2009years. Conclusion: Arteriovenous fistulas should be considered in selected patients with ventricular assist devices as a means of long-term hemodialysis access to avoid use of catheters. Maturation and usage of primary arteriovenous fistulas is possible despite lack of pulsatile flow.