United European Gastroenterology Journal | 2019

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in gastric adenocarcinoma patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background Recent studies demonstrated the positive impact of neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer. Objective To assess the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for neoadjuvant therapy (T\u2009≥\u20092 and/or N+). Methods Retrospective analysis of patients with an anatomopathological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2011 and June 2017, who had EUS for staging and underwent surgery as a first therapeutic attempt. The concordance (k) and accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)) of EUS for T\u2009≥\u20092 and/or N+ were assessed using the anatomopathological staging of the resected surgical specimen as the gold standard. Results The final sample included 152 patients (66.4% male, 67.1\u2009±\u200912.2 years). The concordance, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the EUS for T\u2009≥\u20092 and/or N+ were 0.72, 0.86\u2009±\u20090.03, 88.5% and 83.1%, respectively. The results were higher in proximal (k\u2009=\u20090.93, AUC\u2009=\u20090.96\u2009±\u20090.05, sensitivity (S)\u2009=\u200999.0% and specificity (E)\u2009=\u200990.9%) compared with distal lesions (k\u2009=\u20090.67, AUC\u2009=\u20090.84\u2009±\u20090.04, S\u2009=\u200985.7% and E\u2009=\u200981.5%), and in intestinal subtype (k\u2009=\u20090.77, AUC\u2009=\u20090.88\u2009±\u20090.04, S\u2009=\u200992.6% and E\u2009=\u200984.1%) compared with diffuse (k\u2009=\u20090.58, AUC\u2009=\u20090.79\u2009±\u20090.10, S\u2009=\u200985.0% and E\u2009=\u200972.7%) or mixed-subtype tumours (k\u2009=\u20090.65, AUC\u2009=\u20090.84\u2009±\u20090.10, S\u2009=\u200976.9% and E\u2009=\u200990.0%). Conclusion In one of the largest series of patients, we showed that EUS has overall high agreement and accuracy in the selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for neoadjuvant therapy, although the agreement and accuracy are greater for proximal and intestinal lesions.

Volume 7
Pages 278 - 286
DOI 10.1177/2050640618818942
Language English
Journal United European Gastroenterology Journal

Full Text