First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?

Abstract

Background Although general practitioners (GPs) are generally considered as the first point of contact for care, this may be different for persons with complex conditions, such as those with spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of this study is to understand the differences in long-term care provision by GPs and SCI-specialists, by examining (1) the first contact of care for SCI health problems, (2) the morbidity profile and use of health-care services in relation to first contact, and (3) the factors associated with the choice of first contact. Methods In this cross-sectional study based on data derived from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study Community Survey 2017, the main outcome measure was the reported first contact for SCI-specific care. This information was analysed using the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis of groups based on patient characteristics, use of health-care services and secondary health conditions assessed using the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS). Results Out of 1294 respondents, 1095 reported their first contact for SCI-specific care; 56% indicated SCI-specialists and 44% specified GPs. On average, participants who first contacted a GP reported higher number of GP consultations (5.1\u2009±\u20095.2 vs. 3.9\u2009±\u20097.2), planned visits to ambulatory clinics (3.7\u2009±\u20097.3 vs. 3.6\u2009±\u20096.7) and hospital admissions (GP, 1.9\u2009±\u20091.7 vs. 1.5\u2009±\u20091.3), but lower number of visits to SCI-specialists (1.7\u2009±\u20091.8 vs. 2.6\u2009±\u20091.7) and of hospital days (22.8\u2009±\u200943.2 vs. 31.0\u2009±\u200942.8). The likelihood to contact a GP first was significantly higher in persons ≥75\u2009years old (OR\u2009=\u20094.44, 95% CI\u2009=\u20091.85–10.69), Italian speakers (OR\u2009=\u20095.06, 95% CI\u2009=\u20092.44–10.47), had incomplete lesions (OR\u2009=\u20092.39, 95% CI\u2009=\u20091.71–3.35), experiencing pain (OR\u2009=\u20091.47, 95% CI\u2009=\u20091.04–2.09) or diabetes mellitus (OR\u2009=\u20091.85, 95% CI\u2009=\u20091.05–3.27), but lower for those situated closer to SCI centres (OR\u2009=\u20090.69, 95% CI\u2009=\u20090.51–0.93) or had higher SCI-SCS scores (OR\u2009=\u20090.92, 95% CI\u2009=\u20090.86–0.99). Conclusion Age, language region, travel distance to SCI centres, lesion completeness, and occurrence of secondary conditions play a significant role in determining the choice of first contact of care, however there is still some unwarranted variation that remains unclear and requires further research.