BMC Ophthalmology | 2019

Therapeutic effects of ranibizumab in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

 
 
 

Abstract


BackgroundThere is no consensus on the optimal initial treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Our study aimed to report the efficacy of repeated injections of intravitreal ranibizumab with or without photodynamic therapy for the treatment of PCV and to determine the possible factors predictive of visual outcomes.MethodsThe results of the initial treatment of 40 patients with PCV with 3 monthly injections of ranibizumab were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the results in terms of the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the central retinal thickness (CRT), the number of injections, the regression rates of polyps and the rates of the reduction of subretinal fluid.ResultsAt the 3-month follow-up, the mean BCVA was significantly increased by 7.3\u2009±\u200912.4 letters compared to baseline (p\u2009<\u20090.01). At the 12-month follow-up, the mean BCVA was increased by 3.4\u2009±\u200915.4 letters compared to baseline, and there was no significant difference (p\u2009>\u20090.05). The mean CRT at the 12-month follow-up was 593.58\u2009±\u2009243.64\u2009μm, with an average decrease of 101.55\u2009±\u2009256.07\u2009μm compared to baseline (p\u2009<\u20090.01). Fifteen eyes (18.8%) showed the complete regression of polyps, and 22 eyes (27.5%) showed a reduction in polyps. The baseline VA, the reduction in subretinal fluids and the greatest lesion diameter were significant independent factors that were predictive of improved VA at the final follow-up.ConclusionsThree monthly injections of ranibizumab as an initial treatment could significantly improve VA in PCV patients in the short term. At 12\u2009months postinjection, ranibizumab treatment could stabilize VA in most PCV patients. The baseline VA, the reduction in subretinal fluids and the greatest lesion diameter were predictive factors for the relative improvement of VA at the final follow-up.

Volume 19
Pages None
DOI 10.1186/s12886-019-1156-4
Language English
Journal BMC Ophthalmology

Full Text