BMC Surgery | 2021

Purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy: a procedure which deserves more attention

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background Laparoscopic procedure has inherent merits of smaller incisions, better cosmesis, less postoperative pain, and earlier recovery. In the current study, we presented our method of purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy and compared its results with that of conventional open approach. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our patients from 2012 to 2019 who had received either laparoscopic jejunostomy (LJ, n\u2009=\u200929) or open ones (OJ, n\u2009=\u200994) in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou. Peri-operative data and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results In the current study, we employed 3-0 Vicryl, instead of V-loc barbed sutures, for laparoscopic jejunostomy. The mean operative duration of LJ group was about 30\xa0min longer than the OJ group (159\u2009±\u200957.2\xa0mins vs 128\u2009±\u200934.6\xa0mins; P\u2009=\u20090.001). There were no intraoperative complications reported in both groups. The patients in the LJ group suffered significantly less postoperative pain than in the OJ group (mean NRS 2.03\u2009±\u20090.9 vs. 2.79\u2009±\u20091.2; P \u2009=\u20090.002). The majority of patients in both groups received early enteral nutrition (<\u200948\xa0h) after the operation (86.2% vs. 74.5%; P \u2009=\u20090.143). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that purely laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy is a safe and feasible procedure with less postoperative pain and excellent postoperative outcome. It also provides surgeons opportunities to enhance intracorporeal suture techniques.

Volume 21
Pages None
DOI 10.1186/s12893-021-01050-4
Language English
Journal BMC Surgery

Full Text