BMC Oral Health | 2021

Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis

 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background This study is aimed to (1) investigate the influence of sagittal and vertical patterns on mandibular cross-sectional morphology and to (2) provide visualized mandibular cross-sectional morphology in different groups with General Procrustes Analysis (GPA), canonical variance analysis (CVA) and discriminant function analysis (DFA). Methods 324 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were collected to analyze mandibular cross-sectional morphology and were categorized into 12 groups according to sagittal and vertical pattern and gender. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the difference among the groups. Thirty equidistant points were marked along the contour of mandibular cross-section and GPA, CVA and DFA were applied. Results (1) Mandibular height in hyperdivergent groups was significantly higher than that in normodivergent and hypodivergent groups ( P \u2009<\u20090.05). (2) Hypodivergent groups showed significantly wider upper third of mandibular width from symphysis to molar region than that in hyperdivergent group ( P \u2009<\u20090.05), except for the premolar and molar regions in male groups ( P \u2009>\u20090.05). (3) Class II hyperdivergent group showed narrowest lower third width in the molar region, with the mean value of 12.03\xa0mm in females and 11.98\xa0mm in males. (4) For males and females, the ratio between height and lower third width at symphysis was significantly higher in Class II hyperdivergent group than that in Class I hyperdivergent group ( P \u2009<\u20090.05). Conclusions (1) The influence of vertical facial patterns on mandibular cross-sectional morphology is more obvious than that of sagittal skeletal pattern. (2) Subjects with increased vertical dimension presented with a remarkable “slimer” mandibular cross-sectional morphology at symphysis. (3) A deeper curve along the anterior contour of symphysis in Class II hyperdivergent group was noted with GPA.

Volume 21
Pages None
DOI 10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3
Language English
Journal BMC Oral Health

Full Text