BMC Health Services Research | 2021

Healthcare planning across healthcare sectors in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany: a stakeholder online survey to identify indicators

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background Stakeholders in the German state of Baden-Wuerttemberg agreed upon the central aims for healthcare planning. These include a focus on geographical districts; a comprehensive, cross-sectoral perspective on healthcare needs and services; and use of regional data for healthcare planning. Therefore, healthcare data at district level is needed. Nevertheless, decision makers face the challenge to make a selection from numerous indicators and frameworks, which all have limitations or do not well apply to the targeted setting. The aim of this study was to identify district level indicators to be used in Baden-Wuerttemberg for the purpose of cross-sectoral and needs-based healthcare planning involving stakeholders of the health system. Methods A conceptual framework for indicators was developed. A structured search for indicators identified 374 potential indicators in indicator sets of German and international institutions and agencies ( n \u2009=\u2009211), clinical practice guidelines ( n \u2009=\u200950), data bases ( n \u2009=\u200935), indicator databases ( n \u2009=\u200925), published literature ( n\u2009= \xa035), and other sources ( n \u2009=\u200918). These indicators were categorised according to the developed framework dimensions. In an online survey, institutions of various stakeholders were invited to assess the relevance of these indicators from December 2016 until January 2017. Indicators were selected in terms of a median value of the assessed relevance. Results 22 institutions selected 212 indicators for the five dimensions non-medical determinants of health (20 indicators), health status (25), utilisation of the health system (34), health system performance (87), and healthcare provision (46). Conclusions Stakeholders assessed a large number of indicators as relevant for use in healthcare planning on district level. Trial registration Not applicable.

Volume 21
Pages None
DOI 10.1186/s12913-021-06514-0
Language English
Journal BMC Health Services Research

Full Text