Assessment of setup uncertainty in hypofractionated liver radiation therapy with a breath-hold technique using automatic image registration–based image guidance

Abstract

BackgroundTarget localization in radiation therapy is affected by numerous sources of uncertainty. Despite measures to minimize the breathing motion, the treatment of hypofractionated liver radiation therapy is further challenged by residual uncertainty coming from involuntary organ motion and daily changes in the shape and location of abdominal organs. To address the residual uncertainty, clinics implement image-guided radiation therapy at varying levels of soft-tissue contrast. This study utilized the treatment records from the patients that have received hypofractionated liver radiation therapy using in-room computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess the setup uncertainty and to estimate the appropriate planning treatment volume (PTV) margins in the absence of in-room CT imaging.MethodsWe collected 917 pre-treatment daily in-room CT images from 69 patients who received hypofractionated radiation therapy to the liver with the inspiration breath-hold technique. For each treatment, the daily CT was initially aligned to the planning CT based on the shape of the liver automatically using a CT-CT alignment software. After the initial alignment, manual shift corrections were determined by visual inspection of the two images, and the corrections were applied to shift the patient to the physician-approved treatment position. Considering the final alignment as the gold-standard setup, systematic and random uncertainties in the automatic alignment were quantified, and the uncertainties were used to calculate the PTV margins.ResultsThe median discrepancy between the final and automatic alignment was 1.1\u2009mm (0–24.3\u2009mm), and 38% of treated fractions required manual corrections of ≥3\u2009mm. The systematic uncertainty was 1.5\u2009mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction, 1.1\u2009mm in the left-right (LR) direction, and 2.4\u2009mm in the superior-inferior (SI) direction. The random uncertainty was 2.2\u2009mm in the AP, 1.9\u2009mm in the LR, and 2.2\u2009mm in the SI direction. The PTV margins recommended to be used in the absence of in-room CT imaging were 5.3\u2009mm in the AP, 3.5\u2009mm in the LR, and 5.1\u2009mm in the SI direction.ConclusionsManual shift correction based on soft-tissue alignment is substantial in the treatment of the abdominal region. In-room CT can reduce PTV margin by up to 5\u2009mm, which may be especially beneficial for dose escalation and normal tissue sparing in hypofractionated liver radiation therapy.