Radiation Oncology (London, England) | 2021
Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
Abstract
Purpose To use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to determine the impacts of patient characteristics on the magnitude of geometric setup errors and obtain patient-specific planning target volume (PTV) margins from the correlated patient characteristics in whole breast irradiation (WBI). Methods Between January 2019 and December 2019, a total of 97 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy in WBI, were scanned with pre-treatment CBCT for the first three treatment fractions and weekly for the subsequent fractions. Setup errors in the left–right (LR), superior–inferior (SI) and anterior–posterior (AP) directions were recorded and analyzed with patient characteristics—including age, tumor location, body mass index (BMI), chest circumference (CC) and breast volume (BV)—to examine the predictors for setup errors and obtain specific PTV margins. Results A total of 679 CBCT images from 97 patients were acquired for analysis. The mean setup errors for the whole group were 2.32\u2009±\u20091.21\xa0mm, 3.71\u2009±\u20092.21\xa0mm and 2.75\u2009±\u20091.56\xa0mm in the LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. Patients’ BMI, CC and BV were moderately associated with setup errors, especially in the SI directions (R\u2009=\u20090.40, 0.43 and 0.22, respectively). Setup errors in the SI directions for patients with BMI\u2009>\u200923.8\xa0kg/m 2 , CC\u2009>\u200989\xa0cm and BV\u2009>\u2009657 cm 3 were 4.56\u2009±\u20092.59\xa0mm, 4.77\u2009±\u20092.42\xa0mm and 4.30\u2009±\u20092.43\xa0mm, respectively, which were significantly greater than those of patients with BMI\u2009≤\u200923.8\xa0kg/m 2 , CC\u2009≤\u200989\xa0cm and BV\u2009≤\u2009657 cm 3 ( P \u2009<\u20090.05). Correspondingly, the calculated PTV margins in patients with BMI\u2009>\u200923.8\xa0kg/m 2 , CC\u2009>\u200989\xa0cm and BV\u2009>\u2009657 cm 3 were 4.25/7.95/4.93\xa0mm, 4.37/7.66/5.24\xa0mm and 4.22/7.54/5.29\xa0mm in the LR/SI/AP directions, respectively, compared with 3.64/4.64/5.09\xa0mm, 3.31/4.50/4.82\xa0mm and 3.29/5.74/4.73\xa0mm for BMI\u2009≤\u200923.8\xa0kg/m 2 , CC\u2009≤\u200989\xa0cm and BV\u2009≤\u2009657 cm 3 , respectively. Conclusions The magnitude of geometric setup errors was moderately correlated with BMI, CC and BV. It was recommended to set patient-specific PTV margins according to patient characteristics in the absence of daily image-guided treatment setup.