Radiation Oncology (London, England) | 2021

Multifocal high-grade glioma radiotherapy safety and efficacy

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Background Multifocal manifestation of high-grade glioma is a rare disease with very unfavourable prognosis. The pathogenesis of multifocal glioma and pathophysiological differences to unifocal glioma are not fully understood. The optimal treatment of patients suffering from multifocal high-grade glioma is not defined in the current guidelines, therefore individual case series may be helpful as guidance for clinical decision-making. Methods Patients with multifocal high-grade glioma treated with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in our institution with or without concomitant chemotherapy between April 2011 and April 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Multifocality was neuroradiologically assessed and defined as at least two independent contrast-enhancing foci in the MRI T1 contrast-enhanced sequence. IDH mutational status and MGMT methylation status were assessed from histopathology records. GTV, PTV as well as the V30Gy, V45Gy and D2% volumes of the brain were analysed. Overall and progression-free survival were calculated from the diagnosis until death and from start of radiation therapy until diagnosis of progression of disease in MRI for all patients. Results 20 multifocal glioma cases (18 IDH wild-type glioblastoma cases, one diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH wild-type case with molecular features of glioblastoma and one anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH wild-type case) were included into the analysis. Resection was performed in two cases and stereotactic biopsy only in 18 cases before the start of radiation therapy. At the start of radiation therapy patients were 61\xa0years old in median (range 42–84\xa0years). Histopathological examination showed IDH wild-type in all cases and MGMT promotor methylation in 11 cases (55%). Prescription schedules were 60\xa0Gy (2\xa0Gy\u2009×\u200930), 59.4\xa0Gy (1.8\xa0Gy\u2009×\u200933), 55\xa0Gy (2.2\xa0Gy\u2009×\u200925) and 50\xa0Gy (2.5\xa0Gy\u2009×\u200920) in 15, three, one and one cases, respectively. Concomitant temozolomide chemotherapy was applied in 16 cases, combined temozolomide/lomustine chemotherapy was applied in one case and concomitant bevacizumab therapy in one case. Median number of GTVs was three. Median volume of the sum of the GTVs was 26 cm 3 . Median volume of the PTV was 425.7 cm 3 and median PTV to brain ratio 32.8 percent. Median D2% of the brain was 61.5\xa0Gy (range 51.2–62.7) and median V30Gy and V45 of the brain were 59.9 percent (range 33–79.7) and 40.7 percent (range 14.9–64.1), respectively. Median survival was eight months (95% KI 3.6–12.4\xa0months) and median progression free survival after initiation of RT five months (95% CI 2.8–7.2\xa0months). Grade 2 toxicities were detected in eight cases and grade 3 toxicities in four cases consisting of increasing edema in three cases and one new-onset seizure. One grade 4 toxicity was detected, which was febrile neutropenia related to concomitant chemotherapy. Conclusion Conventionally fractionated RT with concomitant chemotherapy could safely be applied in multifocal high-grade glioma in this case series despite large irradiation treatment fields.

Volume 16
Pages None
DOI 10.1186/s13014-021-01886-3
Language English
Journal Radiation Oncology (London, England)

Full Text