Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | 2021

Less blood loss in supercapsular percutaneously assisted versus posterolateral total hip arthroplasty

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


Although excellent clinical outcomes of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty (SuperPath) have been reported, the peri-operative blood loss has rarely been reported. The current study determined the blood loss during SuperPath and compared the blood loss with conventional posterolateral total hip arthroplasty (PLTH). This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent unilateral primary THA between January 2017 and December 2019. The demographic data, diagnoses, affected side, radiographic findings, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, operative time, transfusion requirements, and intra-operative blood loss were recorded. The peri-operative blood loss was calculated using the OSTHEO formula. Blood loss on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th post-operative days was calculated. Hidden blood loss (HBL) was determined by subtracting the intra-operative blood loss from the total blood loss. Two hundred sixty-three patients were included in the study, 85 of whom were in the SuperPath group and 178 in the posterolateral total hip arthroplasty (PLTH) group. Patient demographics, diagnoses, affected side, operative times, and pre-operative hemoglobin concentrations did not differ significantly between the two groups (all P >\u20090.05). Compared to the PLTH group, the SuperPath group had less blood loss, including intra-operative blood loss, 1st, 3rd, and 5th post-operative days blood loss, and HBL (all P <\u20090.05). Total blood loss and HBL was 790.07 ± 233.37 and 560.67 ± 195.54\u2009mL for the SuperPath group, respectively, and 1141.26 ± 482.52 and 783.45 ± 379.24\u2009mL for the PLTH group. PLTH led to a greater reduction in the post-operative hematocrit than SuperPath (P <\u20090.001). A much lower transfusion rate (P = 0.028) and transfusion volume (P = 0.019) was also noted in the SuperPath group. SuperPath resulted in less perioperative blood loss and a lower transfusion rate than conventional PLTH.

Volume 16
Pages None
DOI 10.1186/s13018-021-02363-z
Language English
Journal Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Full Text