Nodule net: A prospective safety net program to reduce loss to follow-up and increase early detection of lung cancer.

Abstract

1564 Background: Inadequate follow-up of suspicious lung nodules can result in a delay in diagnosis and potential progression to advanced staged lung cancer. A multidisciplinary lung nodule program entitled Nodule Net was implemented in 2017 to provide a safety net, increase the rate of follow-up, streamline management. The program consisted of a multidisciplinary team with EMR notification by the radiologist to a centralized nurse navigator for inclusion in a follow-up database, outreach with reminders to the primary care provider if follow-up was not completed, and referral for management where appropriate. In this study, we sought to evaluate program effectiveness in tracking and rate of follow-up imaging of suspicious pulmonary nodules. Methods: 2,398 chest CT scans were reviewed between January and May 2018 for the presence of a lung nodule that required follow-up. Nodules known to be inflammatory or associated with a metastatic malignancy were excluded. Baseline demographics, medical history, primary care affiliation, type of imaging scan, nodule characteristics, and presence and specifics of follow-up recommendations were collected. For reports that did not include a follow-up recommendation, Fleischner’s recommendations were applied or an independent pulmonologist’s review was completed. The rate of follow-up imaging was recorded and compared with historical rates prior to Nodule Net implementation. Prevalence ratios were generated for each comparison. Results: 1,367 (57%) reported lung nodules. Recommendations for follow-up imaging were recorded in 632 (46.2%), and 523 (82.8%) of these were reported to the program navigator. The rate of follow-up completion of those referred to the program was significantly higher [408 (78%)] than standard of care prior to program implementation [442/1202 (36.8%), (2.90, 95% CI: 2.65-3.18)]. Out of 408 patients who completed follow-up, nodule net outreach was required in 116 (28.4%). Of these 116, malignancy was identified in 4/116 (3.4%). Increased nodule size requiring referral was identified in 17 (14.7%). Out of 109 who were not transmitted to the program navigator and not present in the database, 57 (52.3%) had completed the recommended follow-up compared with 78% among those referred (1.49, 95% CI:1.23-1.79). Conclusions: Management of lung nodules is a complex process with poor follow-up completion reported in prior studies (29%-33%). Implementation of a multidisciplinary lung nodule care program for tracking lung nodules led to a significant increase in completion of recommended follow-up imaging. Developing a comprehensive lung nodule management program using software and navigation may further enhance detection, reduce human errors, augment the necessary follow-up for suspicious lung nodules, and ultimately the prevalence of advanced stage lung cancer.