Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2021

Incidence of immune-related adverse events with pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma and correlation with treatment response: A single institution review of irAEs.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


e21519 Background: Anti-PD-1 therapy has become a mainstay of advanced melanoma treatment. However, associated irAEs are common and contribute to significant delays or cessation of treatment. In this retrospective cohort study, we aim to characterize the real-world irAE profile of pembrolizumab at our institution and its prognostic implications. Methods: We evaluated unresectable stage III-IV melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab between 2011 and 2016 at the University of Arizona Cancer Center (UACC). Information regarding demographics, treatment, irAEs, and hospitalizations were recorded. Adverse events were graded using the common terminology criteria for adverse events v.4.0 (CTCAE). Results: Seventy-three patients were identified, 4 (5.5%) with unresectable stage III and 69 (94.5%) with stage IV melanoma. The median age was 68; 48 (65.8%) patients were male and 25 (34.2%) were female. Nineteen patients (26.0%) had a preexisting autoimmune disorder. 171 irAEs were identified in 58 of the patients. 141 (82.5%) were Grade 1, 24 (14.0%) were Grade 2, and 6 (3.5%) were Grade 3. Incidence and time to onset of significant events is displayed in Table. Eleven (15%) patients were hospitalized, and 8 patients (11.0%) stopped treatment due to an irAE. Sixteen (84.2%) patients with a preexisting autoimmune condition experienced an irAE versus 78% of patients without an autoimmune condition. Twelve patients (75%) had an exacerbation of their autoimmune condition. Response could be assessed in 67 patients . 30 patients of the 67 (45%) had a CR or a PR and 37 patients (55%) had progressive disease (PD). 58 of 67 (87%) experienced an irAE. 29 (50%) of the 58 irAE patients had PD, while 8 (88.9%) of the 9 non-irAE patients had PD. The relative risk of progression in patients who experienced an irAE versus who did not was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.39-0.79, p= 0.001). Conclusions: Experience with pembrolizumab at our institution suggests a similar irAE profile compared to landmark trials, though we observed a higher percentage of patients who required discontinuation of pembrolizumab (11% versus 5% in Phase III trials). In our retrospective study, the risk for progression was significantly higher in patients without irAE versus with any irAE, suggesting that development of irAE could be a positive prognostic sign.[Table: see text]

Volume 39
Pages None
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_SUPPL.E21519
Language English
Journal Journal of Clinical Oncology

Full Text