Patient-Reported Symptom Burden as a Predictor of Emergency Department Use and Unplanned Hospitalization in Head and Neck Cancer: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study.

Abstract

PURPOSE\nTo determine the association between patient-reported symptom burden and subsequent emergency department use and unplanned hospitalization (ED/Hosp) in a head and neck cancer (HNC) patient population.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis was a population-based study of patients diagnosed with HNC who had completed at least one outpatient Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) assessment between January 2007 and March 2018 in Ontario, Canada. Logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between outpatient ESAS scores and subsequent 14-day ED/Hosp use. A generalized estimating equation approach with an exchangeable correlation structure was incorporated to account for patient-level clustering.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere were 11,761 patients identified, completing a total of 73,282 ESAS assessments and experiencing 5,203 ED/Hosp events. Six of the nine ESAS symptom scores were positively associated with ED/Hosp use, with pain, appetite, shortness of breath, and tiredness demonstrating the strongest associations. A global ESAS score was calculated by selecting the highest individual symptom score (h-ESAS). Among patients reporting a maximum h-ESAS score of 10, 15.1% had an ED/Hosp event within 14 days compared with 1.5% for those with the lowest possible score of zero. In adjusted analysis, the odds of ED/Hosp use increased with h-ESAS (1.23 per one-unit increase [95% CI, 1.22 to 1.25]). When treated as a categorical variable, patients with the maximum h-ESAS score of 10 had 9.23 (95% CI, 7.22 to 11.33) higher odds of ED/Hosp use, relative to the minimum score of zero.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nESAS scores are strongly associated with subsequent ED/Hosp events in patients with HNC. Clinician education around how ESAS data might inform patient care may enhance symptom detection and management.