A Critical Appraisal of the Legal and Institutional Arrangement for Wetlands Management in South Africa.

Abstract

\n Policies and institutional frameworks are some of the entering points in mainstreaming the sustainable management of ecosystems such as wetlands. Wetlands are ecological systems that have been internationally acclaimed as natural and cost-effective mechanisms to mitigate disaster risks and address the negative impacts of climate change while providing local livelihoods. However, the continuous degradation of wetlands in many parts of the world including South Africa is concerning and this can be linked to ineffective legislative and institutional arrangements for wetlands management. Using questionnaires, key informant interviews and field observation, this paper assessed the legal and institutional frameworks for the sustainable management and conservation of protected, private and communal wetlands in South Africa. The results indicated that fundamentally there was no direct wetland legislation in South Africa and this is happening more than 47 years after South Africa signed and ratified the Ramsar Convention on the wise-use and conservation of wetlands. The results also indicated that there was poor coordination of important wetland stakeholders. Thirdly, there were many Expanded Public Works Programmes (EPWPs) with overlapping functions in the management of wetlands in South Africa The key recommendations were that a national policy on wetlands should be enacted in South Africa like is the case in Uganda and that all the EPWPs be unified under a single control structure with defined roles and monitoring systems like the case with Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) in the USA. The study further recommend that effective wetlands forums be put in place and the dysfunctional ones be rejuvenated. Lastly, policy makers should be made more conscious on the beneficial functions of wetlands in providing livelihoods, reducing disaster risks and adapting to climate change in South Africa