medRxiv | 2021

Comparing The Efficacy of Anti-Infectious Drugs For The Treatment of Mild To Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Protocol For A Systematic Review And Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


BackgroundCOVID-19 is a viral infection spreading at a great speed and has quickly caused an extensive burden to individuals, families, countries, and the world. No intervention has yet been proven highly effective for the treatment of COVID-19. Different drugs were being evaluated and reported through randomized clinical trials, and more are currently under trial. This review aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-infectious drugs with a comparator of the standard of care or placebo in patients with COVID-19. Methods and analysisTwo independent review authors will extract data and assess a risk of bias using RoB2. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) that evaluate single and/or combined antiviral drugs recommended by WHO latest guideline for the treatment of COVID-19 will be included. We will search for Pub Med, the Cochrane Center for Clinical Trial database (CENTRAL), clinicaltrials.gov, etc. databases for articles published in the English language between December 2019 to April 2021. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) involving Network Meta-analysis guidelines for the design and reporting of the results. The primary endpoints will be time to clinical recovery and time to RNA negativity. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE extension of NMA. Data analysis will be performed using the frequentist NMA approach with netmeta package implemented in R. Ethics and disseminationThere are no ethical considerations associated with this study as we will use publicly available data from previously published studies. We plan to publish results in open access peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO registration numberID=CRD42021230919. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThis will be the first systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy specific to anti-infectious drugs category for for mild to severe patients of COVID-19. C_LIO_LIIts compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Protocols (PRISMA-P) involving network meta-analysis(NMA) will ensure the quality of reporting. C_LIO_LIDoing both pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) can comprehensively analyse direct and indirect comparison results of different anti-infectious drugs for COVID 19 will give more reliable conclusions aswell as the rank of those drugs. C_LIO_LIThere is risk of heterogeneity and inconsistency, given the different anti-infectious drugs that will be included; however, we try to control intransitivity by carefully identifying the eligibility criteria depending on PICOS strategy and assess inconsistency using local as well as global approaches. C_LIO_LIThe limitation of this study is it will not explore the economic benefits of these drugs. C_LI

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.21203/RS.3.RS-585756/V1
Language English
Journal medRxiv

Full Text