Archive | 2021

Operational Definition of Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Derived from a Systematic Search

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


\n Background\n\nIdentifying what therapies constitute complementary, alternative, and/or integrative medicine (CAIM) is complex for a multitude of reasons. An operational definition is dynamic, and changes based on both historical time period and geographical location whereby many jurisdictions may integrate or consider their traditional system(s) of medicine as conventional care. To date, only one operational definition of “complementary and alternative medicine” has been proposed, by Cochrane researchers in 2011. This definition is not only several years old but also did not use systematic methods to compile the therapies. Furthermore, it did not capture the concept “integrative medicine”, which is an increasingly popular aspect of the use of complementary therapies in practice. An updated operational definition reflective of CAIM is warranted given the rapidly increasing body of CAIM research literature published each year.\nMethods\n\nFour peer-reviewed or otherwise quality-assessed information resource types were used to inform the development of the operational definition: peer-reviewed articles resulting from searches across seven academic databases; the “aims and scope” webpages of peer-reviewed CAIM journals; CAIM entries found in online encyclopedias, and highly-ranked websites identified through searches of CAIM-related terms on HONcode. Screening of eligible resources, and data extraction of CAIM therapies across them, were each conducted independently and in duplicate. CAIM therapies across eligible sources were deduplicated.\nResults\n\nA total of 101 eligible resources were identified: peer-reviewed articles (n\u2009=\u200919), journal “aims and scope” webpages (n\u2009=\u200922), encyclopedia entries (n\u2009=\u200911), HONcode-searched websites (n\u2009=\u200949). Six hundred four unique CAIM terms were included in this operational definition of CAIM.\nConclusions\n\nThis updated operational definition is the first to be informed by systematic methods, and could support the harmonization of CAIM-related research through the provision of a standard of classification, as well as support improved collaboration between different research groups.

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.21203/RS.3.RS-737412/V1
Language English
Journal None

Full Text