A Comparative Study of Intralobar Sequestration and Extralobar Pulmonary Sequestration

Abstract

\n Objective: This study aims to identify the difference between patients who have been diagnosed with either intralobar sequestration (ILS) or extralobar sequestration (ELS).Methods: In this clinical study, 29 children with pulmonary sequestration (PS), diagnosed via physical examination and imaging at our hospital between January 2019 and January 2020, were enrolled. We compared whether statistical differences existed in the blood loss, operative time, and post-operative hospital stay between the two groups (ILS and ELS) after thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection.Results: There were no significant differences in gender, operative age, preoperative weight, and isolated lung position between the ILS and ELS groups (p > 0.05). There was significantly more intra-operative bleeding in children with ILS than those with ELS (p < 0.05), and the operation time and postoperative hospitalization times were significantly longer for those with ILS(p < 0.05). Upon microscopic evaluation after surgery, we found the appearance of ILS and ELS to be similar.Conclusion: Different types of congenital PS have different influences onnewborns during and after operation. For children with ILS, surgery is more difficult and the postoperative recovery is slower than for children with ELS. For this reason, we suggest that more attention should be paid to the clinical treatment of children with ILS. Although ILS and ELS present with different manifestations, we found no evidence of a significant difference in the postoperative microscopy of the two conditions.