1080-P: Trends in Clinical Inertia in Diabetes Treatment Intensification in the U.S. Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VA)

Abstract

Despite mounting clinical trial evidence to guide second-line diabetes treatment, clinical inertia could be a persistent barrier to improved care. We analyzed secular trends in second-line diabetes prescribing and timing of intensification in the largest integrated healthcare system in the US. We studied 93,317 Veterans in VA primary care with type 2 diabetes incidence and initial metformin monotherapy from 2004-2015 who were subsequently newly started on add-on therapy from 2010-2015 with a sulfonylurea (SU, n=78,924), insulin (INS, n=10,251), thiazolidinedione (TZD, n=737), or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i, n=3405). We used linear and logistic regression to analyze temporal trends of second-line drug choice, of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at metformin initiation and at initiation of add-on therapy, and of the time to initiating second-line therapy. Over the 6 years, SU use declined (86 to 78%, p=0.003), and INS (9 to 14%, p Conclusions: Inertia in diabetes treatment intensification may be worsening in real-world care potentially blunting the impact of accumulating clinical trial evidence to guide optimal second-line diabetes treatment. Disclosure S. Raghavan: None. L. S. Phillips: Other Relationship; Self; Diasyst Inc., Research Support; Self; AbbVie Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Sanofi-Aventis. L. Caplan: None. J. E. Reusch: Advisory Panel; Self; Medtronic. Funding U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2-CX001907-01)