Archive | 2019

Studying Perturbations on the Input of Two-Layer Neural Networks with ReLU Activation

 

Abstract


Studying Perturbations on the Input of Two-Layer Neural Networks with ReLU Activation Salman Alsubaihi Neural networks was shown to be very susceptible to small and imperceptible perturbations on its input. In this thesis, we study perturbations on two-layer piecewise linear networks. Such studies are essential in training neural networks that are robust to noisy input. One type of perturbations we consider is `∞ norm bounded perturbations. Training Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) that are robust to norm bounded perturbations, or adversarial attacks, remains an elusive problem. While verification based methods are generally too expensive to robustly train large networks, it was demonstrated in [1] that bounded input intervals can be inexpensively propagated per layer through large networks. This interval bound propagation (IBP) approach lead to high robustness and was the first to be employed on large networks. However, due to the very loose nature of the IBP bounds, particularly for large networks, the required training procedure is complex and involved. In this work, we closely examine the bounds of a block of layers composed of an affine layer followed by a ReLU nonlinearity followed by another affine layer. In doing so, we propose probabilistic bounds, true bounds with overwhelming probability, that are provably tighter than IBP bounds in expectation. We then extend this result to deeper networks through blockwise propagation and show that we can achieve orders of magnitudes tighter bounds compared to IBP. With such tight bounds, we demonstrate that a simple standard training procedure can achieve the best robustness-accuracy tradeoff across several architectures on both MNIST and CIFAR10. We, also, consider 5 Gaussian perturbations, where we build on a previous work that derives the first and second output moments of a two-layer piecewise linear network [2]. In this work, we derive an exact expression for the second moment, by dropping the zero mean assumption in [2].

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.25781/KAUST-32PC9
Language English
Journal None

Full Text