Poultry Science | 2019

Relationships between feeding behaviors and performance traits in slow‐growing yellow broilers

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


ABSTRACT This study was conducted to investigate the feeding behaviors of slow‐growing yellow broilers and the relationships of feeding behaviors with performance traits. With the help of automatic recording systems in floor houses, feeding events from a pure line of slow‐growing yellow broilers were recorded from 57 to 77 d of age. After data quality control, a total of 116,477 feeding records from 319 birds were used for analyses. Feeding behaviors including number of visits per day (18.74), feeding duration per day (71.17 min/d), feeding duration per visit (262.00 s/visit), feeding rate (2.19 g/min), and feed intake per visit (8.52 g/visit) were calculated according to feeding records. Correlation analyses and comparisons between divergent efficiency groups were performed to examine the relationships between feed efficiency and feeding behaviors. Absolute correlations between residual feed intake (RFI) and feeding behaviors (except for feed intake per visit) were significant but weak (r = 0.18 to 0.34, P < 0.05), whereas feed conversion ratio (FCR) was not significantly correlated with any feeding behaviors. All of the weight‐associated traits were positively correlated with feeding rate and feed intake per visit (r = 0.19 to 0.25, P < 0.05). Compared with the inefficient birds with the 20% highest RFI or FCR (HRFI or HFCR), the efficient ones with the 20% lowest RFI or FCR (LRFI or LFCR) ate faster (P < 0.05), spent shorter eating duration (P < 0.05) and had similar feed intakes per visit (P > 0.05). However, number of visits per day and the feeding duration per day were lower in the LRFI group than in the HRFI group (P < 0.05) but were not significantly different between the LFCR and HFCR groups (P > 0.05). In summary, this study shows the feeding behaviors of group‐housed slow‐growing yellow broilers and observed that RFI has closer relationships with feeding behaviors than FCR does, and the selection for birds with improved RFI may result in fewer visits, shorter duration and faster feeding rate.

Volume 98
Pages 548–555
DOI 10.3382/ps/pey424
Language English
Journal Poultry Science

Full Text