RARβ Expression in Keratinocytes from Potentially Malignant Oral Lesions: The Functional Consequences of Re-Expression by De-Methylating Agents

Abstract

Simple Summary Patients may develop white or red patches of the lining of the mouth with an increased risk of developing oral cancer. Treatment with Vitamin A derivatives (retinoids) results in some improvement in these lesions, but this is not maintained, and there are side effects. We know that the cells of the mouth lose cellular receptors for retinoids as these lesions develop, initially by a reversible alteration to the DNA (DNA methylation). Drugs, such as 5-AZA-CdR, which reduce DNA methylation, may restore sensitivity to the effects of retinoids. Treatment of a panel of cells from mouth precancer white patches with retinoids, 5-AZA-CdR and a combination results in varied responses: some cells re-sensitise to retinoids, whereas in others, the main effects on cell division rate and cell lifespan seem related to the effects of 5-AZA-CdR alone. These findings help us to understand the varied responses to retinoids in the clinical setting. Abstract Loss of RARβ2 expression by promoter methylation is an early event in oral carcinogenesis. Understanding the mechanisms and consequences of RARβ loss may aid in understanding the disappointing results of retinoid chemoprevention trials. This study aimed to describe the effects of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and the de-methylating agent 5-Aza-2′ deoxycytidine (5-AZA-CdR) on a panel of immortal potentially malignant oral lesion (PMOL) cell cultures. RARβ expression was assessed in PMOL tissues by immunohistochemistry. Cells were treated with ATRA ± 5-AZA-CdR, and the effects on the cell cycle and senescence were assessed. In PMOL tissues, RARβ expression was variable, but lower in biopsies which gave rise to immortal cell cultures. Treatment of iPMOL cells with ATRA resulted in little change in RARβ expression, but the addition of 5-AZA-CdR resulted in significant increases. The effects on the cell cycle and senescence were variable and may be related to 5-AZA-CdR, as this has wider effects on the cell cycle. Overall, the response of iPMOL cells to ATRA and 5-AZA-CdR treatment was variable and is dependent on several factors, including RARβ-promoter methylation. These findings may help to explain the lack of consistent effect of retinoids in PMOLs seen in chemoprevention trials.