Histone Deacetylase (HDAC)-1, -2, -4, and -6 in Uveal Melanomas: Associations with Clinicopathological Parameters and Patients’ Survival

Abstract

Simple Summary Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) have been reportedly associated with tumor development and progression in several types of human malignancy, being currently investigated as potential targets of anti-cancer therapy. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical significance and prognostic role of the of HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 immunohistochemical expression, in 75 uveal melanoma (UM) cases. HDACs are differentially expressed in UMs, HDAC-2 being the most frequently expressed isoform, whereas cytoplasmic expression of class I HDAC isoforms is also observed. Additionally, HDAC-1 was associated with increased tumor size, HDAC-6 with mitotic index, and HDAC-2 with epithelioid cell morphology and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, both parameters of adverse prognosis. Moreover, our data support a significant association of HDAC-2 with patients’ improved OS. These findings suggest that HDACs, and especially HDAC-2, may be implicated in the formation and progression of UM. Abstract Background: Uveal melanoma (UM) represents the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, exerting high metastatic potential and poor prognosis. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play a key role in carcinogenesis, and HDAC inhibitors (HDACIs) are currently being explored as anti-cancer agents in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 expression in UM. Methods: HDAC-1, -2, -4, and -6 expression was examined immunohistochemically in 75 UM tissue specimens and was correlated with tumors’ clinicopathological characteristics, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILS), as well as with our patients’ overall survival (OS). Results: HDAC-2 was the most frequently expressed isoform (66%), whereas we confirmed in addition to the expected nuclear expression the presence of cytoplasmic expression of class I HDAC isoforms, namely HDAC-1 (33%) and HDAC-2 (9.5%). HDAC-4 and -6 expression was cytoplasmic. HDAC-1 nuclear expression was associated with increased tumor size (p = 0.03), HDAC-6 with higher mitotic index (p = 0.03), and nuclear HDAC-2 with epithelioid cell morphology (p = 0.03) and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (p = 0.04). The association with the remaining parameters including Monosomy 3 was not significant. Moreover, the presence as well as the nuclear expression pattern of HDAC-2 were correlated with patients’ improved OS and remained significant in multivariate survival analysis. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence for a potential role of HDACs and especially HDAC-2 in the biological mechanisms governing UM evolution and progression.