Evaluation of forensic computer and technical expertise in criminal proceedings

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to clarify the place and role of the expert report based on the results of forensic computer and technical expertise as a source of evidence in criminal proceedings. The subject of the study: The subject of research is forensic computer and technical expertise as a source of evidence in criminal proceedings. Methodology: The method of system analysis, formal and logical, system and structural methods, the methods of modeling and forecasting were used in the course of the research were used in the course of the study. The results of the study: According to the results of the study, the authors conclude that forensic computer and technical expertise is the main procedural form of using special knowledge in the area of computer technology, and its results may be the most important part of the evidence base in the specific criminal proceedings. Practical consequences: It is concluded that the use of the expert report based on the results of forensic computer and technical expertise in criminal proceedings is its application by the Анотація Метою статті є з’ясування місця та ролі висновку експерта за результатами судової комп’ютерно-технічної експертизи як джерела доказів у кримінальному процесуальному доказуванні. Предмет дослідження: Предметом дослідження є судова комп’ютерно-технічна експертиза як джерело доказів у кримінальному процесуальному доказуванні. Методологія: У ході проведення дослідження були використані наступні методи наукового пізнання: метод системного аналізу, формально-логічний, системно-структурний метод, методи моделювання та прогнозування. Результати дослідження: За результатами дослідження автори дійшли висновку, що судова комп’ютерно-технічна експертиза є основною процесуальною формою використання спеціальних знань у галузі комп’ютерних технологій, а її результати можуть бути найважливішою частиною доказової бази у певному кримінальному провадженні. Практичні наслідки: Зроблено висновок, що використання висновку експерта 70 Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Investigator of the Sixth Division (Investigation of Crimes Committed in the Temporarily Occupied Territories of Ukraine) of the Pre-trial Investigation Department of the Main Investigation Department National Police of Ukraine. 71 Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminology of the Faculty No 1 of the Institute for Training Specialists for the National Police of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine. 72 Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine. 73 Candidate of legal sciences, Deputy Head of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure for Educational Work of Lviv University of Trade and Economics (LUTE), Ukraine. 74 Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine. Klymchuk, M., Marko, S., Priakhin, Y., Stetsyk, B., Khytra, A. / Volume 10 Issue 38: 204-211 / February, 2021 Volume 10 Issue 38 / February 2021 205 http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322 6307 subjects of evidence during the qualification of criminal offense to establish facts and circumstances relevant to criminal proceedings and subject to proof, as well as to resolve other tactical tasks. Value / originality: The authors’ definition of assessing expert report based on the results of forensic computer and technical expertise is offered.