Study of setup error in cone beam CT for whole breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy with breast board immobilization

Abstract

Objective \nTo investigate the setup errors and influencing factors of the whole breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after breast-conserving surgery, and to identify the margins from clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV). \n \n \nMethods \nThirty patients with left-sided (n=15) or right-sided breast cancer (n=15) receiving whole breast hypofractionated IMRT with breast board immobilization after breast-conserving surgery in Cancer Hospital from 2016 to 2017 were enrolled. The kilo-voltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to compare the errors of planning CT and treatment unit and determine the setup errors. The margins from CTV to PTV were calculated. The setup errors under different conditions were statistically compared by t-test. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 151 sets of CBCT images were taken in the whole cohort, (5.0±1.3) sets per patient on average. The setup errors in the x-axis (left-right direction), y-axis (cranial-caudal direction) and z-axis (anterior-posterior direction) were (2.2±1.7) mm, (3.1±2.5) mm and (3.3±2.3) mm, respectively. The margins from CTV to PTV were 6.39 mm, 10.00 mm and 8.57 mm, respectively. The setup error in anterior-posterior direction in the first week was (3.7±2.5) mm, significantly larger than (2.6±1.6) mm in the following week (P=0.002). The setup error of the patients with overweight or obesity was (3.9±2.6) mm, significantly higher than (2.9±2.0) mm in those with normal weight in the z-axis direction (P=0.033). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe margins from CTV to PTV are recommended to be ranged from 6 to 10 mm during hypofractionated whole breast IMRT with breast board immobilization after breast-conserving surgery. More frequent imaging verification should be applied in the first week of IMRT. \n \n \nKey words: \nBreast neoplasm/radiotherapy;\xa0Cone-beam CT;\xa0Setup error;\xa0Margin