Peer Discussion Decreases Practice Intensity and Increases Certainty in Clinical Decision-Making Among Internal Medicine Residents.

Abstract

Background\nTeam-based decision-making has been shown to reduce diagnostic error, increase clinical certainty, and decrease adverse events.\n\n\nObjective\nThis study aimed to assess the effect of peer discussion on resident practice intensity (PI) and clinical certainty (CC).\n\n\nMethods\nA vignette-based instrument was adapted to measure PI, defined as the likelihood of ordering additional diagnostic tests, consultations or empiric treatment, and CC. Internal medicine residents at 7 programs in the Philadelphia area from April 2018 to June 2019 were eligible for inclusion in the study. Participants formed groups and completed each item of the instrument individually and as a group with time for peer discussion in between individual and group responses. Predicted group PI and CC scores were compared with measured group PI and CC scores, respectively, using paired t testing.\n\n\nResults\nSixty-nine groups participated in the study (response rate 34%, average group size 2.88). The measured group PI score (2.29, SD = 0.23) was significantly lower than the predicted group PI score (2.33, SD = 0.22) with a mean difference of 0.04 (SD = 0.10; 95% CI 0.02-0.07; P = .0002). The measured group CC score (0.493, SD = 0.164) was significantly higher than the predicted group CC score (0.475, SD = 0.136) with a mean difference of 0.018 (SD = 0.073; 95% CI 0.0006-0.0356; P = .022).\n\n\nConclusions\nIn this multicenter study of resident PI, peer discussion reduced PI and increased CC more than would be expected from averaging group members individual scores.