ECHOGENIC MASS ATTACHED TO TRICUSPID VALVE

Abstract

SUMMARY \nA 5-day old female child with complaints of tachypnea, had TTE which revealed an echogenic mass on septal leaflet of Tricuspid valve. Based on echocardiographic features, it was diagnosed as Papillary fibroelastoma. \nCASE DESCRIPTION \nA 5-day old female child was referred for transthoracic echocardiographic study due to respiratory difficulty. The child was afebrile and had a respiratory rate of 60/min, heart rate 130 bpm, and blood pressure 80/50 mmHg. No murmur or added sound heard on CVS examination. TTE revealed a dense mass (Figure 1) attached to right atrial side of septal leaflet of Tricuspid valve by a small pedicle. The mass was mobile, prolapsing into right ventricle during diastole (Clips) without causing obstruction with size of 0.8 X 0.74 cm. Intracardiac masses attached to valves are usually Papillary fibroelastomas. Other possible differential diagnoses could be myxoma, vegetation, Lambl’s excrescence or secondary tumors etc. Based on the location and echo features of the mass (mobility, attachment to downstream side of valve, and frond like speckled appearance) the diagnosis of Papillary fibroelastoma was made. \n\xa0LEARNING POINTS \n \nCardiac tumors are rare and mostly benign. \nThe three most common primary tumors of heart, in order of frequency, are myxomas, lipomas and papillary fibroelastomas respectively. PFE constitute 7% - 9% of all.1 \nPFE usually arise from valves of the heart and are mostly left-sided.2 \nThey are mobile, range from 0.5 – 2 cm in size and have a frond-like appearance. On echo, they are dense with a speckled interior and shimmering surface.3 \nBeing prone to embolization and thrombosis, their clinical course may not be benign, especially left sided. \n \nClips \n \nSubcostal Clip: https://youtu.be/_xTZmx--WcA \nPS SAX View: https://youtu.be/lLh6D9Vn4Fw \nA4C View: https://youtu.be/_xZZvTIh0S8 \nA4C RV Directed View: https://youtu.be/vJRyHrevftA \n \nQUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS \n \nQuestion 1: What is the most common complication of papillary fibroelastoma? \nQuestion 2: The behavior of right and left sided papillary fibroelastomas could be markedly different, Y/N? \nQuestion 3: What is the most important feature of papillary fibroelastoma for embolization? \nQuestion 4: PFE preferentially affects females, Y/N? \n \n\xa0Answers \n \nQuestion 1: Cerebral embolism \nQuestion 2: Yes \nQuestion 3: Mobility \nQuestion 4: No \n \nReferences \n \nBouhzam N, Kurtz B, Doguet F, Eltchaninoff H, Bauer F. Incidental papillary fibroelastoma multimodal: imaging and surgical decisions in 2 patients. Tex Heart Inst J. 2012;39(5):731-5. \nEidem BW, Cetta F, O’ Leary PW. Echocardiography in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer. 2010 p 355-361. \nKlarich KW, Enriquez-Sarano M, Gura GM, Edwards WD, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Papillary fibroelastoma: echocardiographic characteristics for diagnosis and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(3):784-90. \n