Archive | 2021

Dissimilatory nitrate reduction processes along a forest hillslope

 
 
 
 
 
 

Abstract


<p>Dissimilatory nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup>) reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and denitrification (DNF) are major dissimilatory NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> reduction processes, competing for the available NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> under anoxic conditions. The competition among these processes leads to different fates of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> in soil, i.e., loss of nitrogen (N) as benign N<sub>2</sub> or potent greenhouse gas (nitrous oxide, N<sub>2</sub>O), or retaining of N by converting NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> to ammonium. Unfortunately, little is known about the soil-environmental factors controlling the NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> partition. Here we report DNF and DNRA in soils from the top and bottom of the hillslope.</p><p>We sampled soils from a hillslope of forest to generate a soil-environmental gradient. The soil-environmental factors including soil pH, available carbon (potassium chloride-extractable organic carbon: EOC), NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup>, and microbial C and N (MBC and MBN) were determined. We incubated the soils under anoxic condition (i.e., helium atmosphere) and applied a <sup>15</sup>N isotope pairing technique to quantify the potential rates of DNRA and DNF. Briefly, we incubated the soil under anoxic condition (i.e., helium atmosphere) to remove any N oxides and oxygen, then we added <sup>15</sup>NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> (99.9%) and measured the production rates of <sup>15</sup>NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, <sup>30</sup>N<sub>2</sub>, and <sup>46</sup>N<sub>2</sub>O.</p><p>The results showed that (1) a good gradient of the soil-environmental variables was observed along the hillslope from top to bottom, including pH (top&#8211;bottom; 3.95&#8211;4.78), EOC:NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> (184&#8211;18.7), and MBC: MBN (8.2&#8211;6.3); (2) DNRA rate tended to be higher at the top of the hillslope with DNF being nearly inactive, resulting in a dominance of DNRA (59&#8211;97%), while the trend was reversed at the bottom, with DNF rates being much higher and dominantly contributing to NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> reduction (89&#8211;97%); and (3) during DNF process, the magnitude of N<sub>2</sub>O production rates was comparable or even higher than that of N<sub>2</sub> in the soils from the bottom of the hillslope. The ratio of the N<sub>2</sub>O to N<sub>2</sub> production (N<sub>2</sub>O:N<sub>2</sub>) was much higher in the soils from the top despite the low DNF rates.</p><p>The remarkably different patterns of DNRA and DNF rates and relative contributions between the top and bottom of the hillslope are controlled by the EOC:NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup>: DNRA was preferred over DNF when NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> was limited (i.e., high EOC:NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup>) because more free energy is liberated per unit of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>&#8722;</sup> reduced for DNRA as compared to DNF. The substantial production of N<sub>2</sub>O at the bottom of the hillslope indicates that previous studies that considered only <sup>30</sup>N<sub>2</sub> production rate could have highly underestimated the DNF rate. The high N<sub>2</sub>O:N<sub>2</sub> at the top is likely caused by the low pH as well as the dominance of fungi, of which the N<sub>2</sub>O reductase is generally lacking, pointing to the key roles of soil pH and microbial community structure in regulating the product stoichiometry of N<sub>2</sub>O and N<sub>2</sub> in DNF.</p>

Volume None
Pages None
DOI 10.5194/EGUSPHERE-EGU21-10536
Language English
Journal None

Full Text