Evaluation of leaf-level optical properties employed in land surface models – example with CLM 5.0

Abstract

Abstract. Vegetation optical properties have a direct impact on canopy absorption and scattering and are thus needed for modeling surface fluxes. Although Plant Functional Type (PFT) classification varies between different land surface models (LSMs), their optical properties must be specified. The aim of this study is to revisit the time-invariant optical properties table of the Simple Biosphere (SiB) model (later referred as SiB-table ) presented 30-years ago by Dorman and Sellers (1989) which has since become adopted by many LSMs. This revisit was needed as much of the data underlying the SiB-table was not formally reviewed or published or was based on older papers or personal communications (i.e. the validity of the optical property source data cannot be inspected due to missing data sources, outdated citation practices, and varied estimation methods). As many of today s LSMs (e.g. Community Land Model (CLM), Jena Scheme of Atmosphere Biosphere Coupling in Hamburg (JSBACH), and Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES)) either rely on the optical properties of the SiB-table or lack references altogether for those they do employ, there is a clear need to assess (and confirm or correct) the appropriateness of those being used in today s LSMs. Here, we use various spectral databases to synthesize and harmonize the key optical property information of PFT classification shared by many leading LSMs. For forests, such classifications typically differentiate PFTs by broad geo-climatic zones (i.e. tropical, boreal, temperate) and phenology (i.e. deciduous vs. evergreen). For short-statured vegetation, such classifications typically differentiate between crops and grasses and by photosynthetic pathway. Using the PFT classification of the CLM (version 5) as an example, we found the optical properties of the visible band (VIS; 400–700\u2009nm) to be appropriate. However, in the near-infrared and shortwave infrared bands (NIR+SWIR; e.g. 701–2500\u2009nm, referred as NIR ) notable differences between CLM default and measured estimates were observed, thus suggesting that NIR optical properties need updating in the model. For example, for conifer PFTs, the measured mean needle albedo estimates in NIR were 62\u2009% and 78\u2009% larger than the CLM default parameters, and for PFTs with flat-leaves, the measured mean leaf albedo values in NIR were 20\u2009%, 14\u2009% and 19\u2009% larger than the CLM defaults. We also found that while the CLM5 PFT-dependent leaf angle definitions were sufficient for forested PFTs and grasses, for crop PFTs the default parameterization appeared too vertically oriented thus warranting an update. In addition, we propose using separate bark reflectance values for conifer and deciduous PFTs and introduce the concept and application of photon recollision probability (p). The p may be used to upscale needle spectra into shoot spectra to meet the common assumption that foliage is located randomly within the canopy volume (behind canopy radiative transfer calculation) to account for multiple scattering effects caused by needles clustered into shoots.