Complement activation and cryoglobulinemia are common in monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: Data from a case series.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION\nMonoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) denotes kidney diseases caused by monoclonal immunoglobulins in patients who do not have an overt hematological malignancy. Treatment is primarily directed against the underlying clone. Complement activation and cryoglobulinemia are known factors that can contribute to tissue damage, however, the full extent of their involvement is not clear.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThis was a retrospective study including all patients with MGRS referred for consultation to our hospital over a 3-year period.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe identified 17 patients, of which 12 had proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID). Treatment with anti-clonal or immunosuppressive therapy was successful in 60% of patients with PGNMID, and treatment success was more common in patients with λ chain (100%) compared to κ chain deposits (20%). Serum markers of complement involvement were identified in 41% of all patients (88% of tested samples), most commonly high serum C5b-9 values or anti-factor H autoantibodies (both 24%). Patients with complement involvement did not respond well to treatment, which was unsuccessful in all treated patients with anti-factor H autoantibodies and 75% of patients with high serum C5b-9 values. Cryoglobulinemia was identified in 29% of all patients (71% tested samples) and was monoclonal in 40% of positive cases and mixed in 60%. None of the patients with cryoglobulinemia had organized deposits, however, there was a trend toward more common intramembranous deposits. In patients with monoclonal cryoglobulinemia both anti-clonal and immunosuppressive treatment were unsuccessful. All patients with mixed cryoglobulinemia were treated successfully with immunosuppressive therapy.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nTreatment of patients with PGNMID was successful in most cases. Complement involvement as well as monoclonal and mixed cryoglobulinemia were relatively common in our cohort, with the first two generally associated with unsuccessful treatment and the latter with successful treatment.