REPENSANDO A BANALIDADE DO MAL EM TEMPOS HODIERNOS À LUZ DO PENSAMENTO DE HANNAH ARENDT

Abstract

The objective of the present work is to expose a critical analysis to the preliminary injunction of Habeas Corpus 183.44, which remained impaired. As patients on the remedy, all vulnerable people are presented, provisionally imprisoned. In the face of the calamity scenario, due to the covid pandemic 19, a public defender pleaded for the granting of the injunction, as well as for the immediate relaxation of the prison with or without the imposition of other precautionary measures, or alternatively, the replacement of the preventive prison by prison at home. The punctual criticism, concerning the writing, is about the allegation of suppression of instance at the expense of the demand for speed and protection of the right to life. The decision, object of our indignation, seems to us the product of the incarnation of a banal evil, proposed by Hannah Arent, a German philosopher. The banal evil, in the decision under analysis, is revealed in the inability for thought, it is translated in the inability to think or dialogue with values of our order.