Researchain Logo Researchain
  • Decentralized Journals

    A

    Archives
  • Avatar
    Welcome to Researchain!
    Feedback Center
Decentralized Journals
A
Archives Updated
Archive Your Research
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Collective neutrino oscillations accounting for neutrino quantum decoherence

Konstantin Stankevich,  Alexander Studenikin

Abstract
In our previous studies (see [1] and references therein) we developed a new theoretical framework that enabled one to consider a new mechanism of neutrino quantum decoherence engendered by the neutrino radiative decay. In parallel, another framework was developed (see [2] and references therein) for the description of the neutrino quantum decoherence due to the non-forward neutrino scattering processes. Both mechanisms are described by the master equations in the Lindblad form. We study the influence of the neutrino quantum decoherence on collective neutrino oscillations. In the present studies we are are not interested in a specific mechanism of neutrino quantum decoherence. Therefore, we use the general Lindblad master equation for the description of the neutrino quantum decoherence and do not fix an analytical expressions for the decoherence and relaxation parameters.
Full PDF

aa r X i v : . [ h e p - ph ] F e b Collective neutrino oscillations accounting for neutrinoquantum decoherence

Konstantin Stankevich π‘Ž, βˆ— and Alexander Studenikin π‘Ž,𝑏 π‘Ž Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University,Moscow 119991, Russia 𝑏 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,Dubna 141980, Moscow Region, Russia

E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

In our previous studies (see [1] and references therein) we developed a new theoretical frameworkthat enabled one to consider a new mechanism of neutrino quantum decoherence engendered bythe neutrino radiative decay. In parallel, another framework was developed (see [2] and referencestherein) for the description of the neutrino quantum decoherence due to the non-forward neutrinoscattering processes. Both mechanisms are described by the master equations in the Lindbladform.In the present studies we are are not interested in a specific mechanism of neutrino quantumdecoherence. Therefore, we use the general Lindblad master equation for the description of theneutrino quantum decoherence and do not fix an analytical expressions for the decoherence andrelaxation parameters.We study the influence of the neutrino quantum decoherence on collective neutrino oscillations.Collective neutrino oscillations is a phenomenon engendered by neutrino-neutrino interaction. Itis significant in different astrophysical environments where the neutrino density is extremely high.Examples of such environments are the early universe, supernovae explosions, binary neutron stars,accretion discs of black holes. The effect of collective neutrino oscillations attracts the growinginterest in sight of appearance of multi-messenger astronomy and constructing of new large-volumeneutrino detectors that will be highly efficient for observing neutrino fluxes from supernovaeexplosions. Previously, it was shown that neutrino quantum decoherence can significantly modifythe neutrino fluxes from reactors and the sun. Here below we study the influence of the neutrinoquantum decoherence on supernovae neutrino fluxes. The peculiarity of the supernovae fluxes isthat one of the main modes of neutrino oscillations in supernovae is engendered by the collectiveeffects. Note, in the previous studies dedicated to the collective neutrino oscillations only thekinematical decoherence (see [3] and references therein) was accounted for. βˆ— Speaker Β© Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). https://pos.sissa.it/ ollective neutrino oscillations accounting for neutrino quantum decoherence

Konstantin StankevichConsider the two-flavor neutrino mixing scenarios, i.e. the mixing between 𝜈 𝑒 and 𝜈 π‘₯ stateswhere 𝜈 π‘₯ stands for 𝜈 πœ‡ or 𝜈 𝜏 . Here below we focus on the derivation of the neutrino oscillationprobability and highlight the interplay between collective neutrino oscillations and neutrino quantumdecoherence. We use the simplified model of supernova neutrinos that was considered in [4, 5]. Insuch a model neutrinos are produced and emitted with a single energy and a single emission angle.The neutrino evolution in supernovae environment that accounts for neutrino quantum deco-herence is determined by the following equations 𝑖 π‘‘πœŒ 𝑓 𝑑𝑑 = [ 𝐻, 𝜌 𝑓 ] + 𝐷 [ 𝜌 𝑓 ] , 𝑖 𝑑 Β― 𝜌 𝑓 𝑑𝑑 = [ Β― 𝐻, Β― 𝜌 𝑓 ] + 𝐷 [ Β― 𝜌 𝑓 ] , (1)where 𝜌 𝑓 ( Β― 𝜌 𝑓 ) is the density matrix for neutrino (antineutrino) in the flavour basis and 𝐻 ( Β― 𝐻 )are total neutrino (antineutrino) Hamiltonian. Neutrino quantum decoherence is described by thedissipation term 𝐷 [ 𝜌 ] that we define in the next section.Hamiltonian 𝐻 contains the three terms 𝐻 = 𝐻 π‘£π‘Žπ‘ + 𝐻 𝑀 + 𝐻 𝜈𝜈 , where 𝐻 π‘£π‘Žπ‘ is the vacuumHamiltonian, 𝐻 𝑀 and 𝐻 𝜈𝜈 are Hamiltonians that describe matter potential and neutrino-neutrinointeraction correspondingly. The exact expressions one can find in [4, 5]. The dissipation term 𝐷 [ 𝜌 ] we write in the Lindblad form 𝐷 [ 𝜌 ˜ π‘š ( 𝑑 )] = Γ• π‘˜ = h 𝑉 π‘˜ , 𝜌 ˜ π‘š 𝑉 † π‘˜ i + h 𝑉 π‘˜ 𝜌 ˜ π‘š , 𝑉 † π‘˜ i , (2)where 𝑉 π‘˜ are the dissipative operators that arise from interaction between the neutrino system andthe external environment, 𝜌 ˜ π‘š is the neutrino density matrix in the effective mass basis. Here below,we omit index β€œ ˜ π‘š ” in order not overload formulas. The operators 𝑉 π‘˜ , 𝜌 𝑓 and 𝐻 can be expandedover the Pauli matrices 𝑂 = π‘Ž πœ‡ 𝜎 πœ‡ , where 𝜎 πœ‡ are composed by an identity matrix and the Paulimatrices. In this case eq. (1) can be written in the following form πœ•π‘ƒ π‘˜ ( 𝑑 ) πœ•π‘‘ 𝜎 π‘˜ = πœ– 𝑖 π‘—π‘˜ 𝐻 𝑖 𝑃 𝑗 ( 𝑑 ) 𝜎 π‘˜ + 𝐷 π‘˜π‘™ 𝑃 𝑙 ( 𝑑 ) 𝜎 π‘˜ , (3)where the matrix 𝐷 𝑙𝑙 = βˆ’ π‘‘π‘–π‘Žπ‘” { Ξ“ , Ξ“ , Ξ“ } and Ξ“ , Ξ“ are the parameters that describe two dissipativeeffects: 1) the decoherence effect and 2) the relaxation effect, correspondingly. In the case of theenergy conservation in the neutrino system there is an additional requirement on a dissipativeoperators [6] [ 𝐻 𝑆 , 𝑉 π‘˜ ] =

0. In this case the relaxation parameter is equal to zero Ξ“ =

0. Herebelow, we consider only the case of the energy conservation, i.e. Ξ“ = 𝛿𝑃 π‘˜ around the initial configuration 𝑃 π‘˜ and a corresponding variation of the density dependentHamiltonian 𝛿𝐻 π‘˜ around the initial Hamiltonian 𝐻 π‘˜ : 𝑃 π‘˜ = 𝑃 π‘˜ + 𝛿𝑃 π‘˜ where 𝛿𝑃 π‘˜ = 𝑃 β€² π‘˜ 𝑒 βˆ’ π‘–πœ”π‘‘ + 𝐻.𝑐. and 𝐻 π‘˜ = 𝐻 π‘˜ + 𝛿𝐻 π‘˜ where 𝛿𝐻 π‘˜ = 𝐻 β€² π‘˜ 𝑒 βˆ’ π‘–πœ”π‘‘ + 𝐻.𝑐. . Where one can write 𝐻 β€² π‘˜ = πœ•π» π‘˜ πœ•π‘ƒ π‘˜ 𝑃 β€² π‘˜ + πœ•π» π‘˜ πœ• Β― 𝑃 π‘˜ Β― 𝑃 β€² π‘˜ .In the case of high electron density the in-medium eigenstates initially coincide with the flavorstates. Therefore, the initial conditions are given by 𝐻 π‘˜ = (cid:0) , , 𝐻 (cid:1) 𝑇 and 𝑃 π‘˜ = (cid:0) , , 𝑃 (cid:1) 𝑇 . Putting2 ollective neutrino oscillations accounting for neutrino quantum decoherence Konstantin Stankevicheverything together and considering only the non-diagonal elements ( 𝜌 = 𝑃 π‘₯ + 𝑖𝑃 𝑦 ) one obtainsthe following equation for eigenvalues (we neglect the higher-order corrections) ( πœ” βˆ’ 𝑖 Ξ“ ) 𝜌 β€² Β― 𝜌 β€² ! = 𝐴 𝐡 Β― 𝐴 Β― 𝐡 ! 𝜌 β€² Β― 𝜌 β€² ! , (4)where on the right-hand side of equation is the stability matrix that coincides with one from [4, 7].In case of a single energy and single emission angle it is expressed as 𝐴 = ( 𝐻 βˆ’ 𝐻 ) βˆ’ πœ•π» πœ• 𝜌 ( 𝜌 βˆ’ 𝜌 ) , 𝐡 = πœ•π» πœ• Β― 𝜌 ( 𝜌 βˆ’ 𝜌 ) , Β― 𝐴 = ( Β― 𝐻 βˆ’ Β― 𝐻 ) βˆ’ πœ• Β― 𝐻 πœ• Β― 𝜌 ( Β― 𝜌 βˆ’ Β― 𝜌 ) , Β― 𝐡 = πœ• Β― 𝐻 πœ• 𝜌 ( Β― 𝜌 βˆ’ Β― 𝜌 ) . (5)The eigenvalues are given by πœ” = 𝑖 Ξ“ + (cid:16) 𝐴 + Β― 𝐴 Β± p ( 𝐴 βˆ’ Β― 𝐴 ) + 𝐡 Β― 𝐡 (cid:17) . One cansee that if the eigenvalues have an imaginary part, the non-diagonal elements of the neutrino densitymatrix can grow exponentially and thus the system become unstable, that is, if ( ( 𝐴 βˆ’ Β― 𝐴 ) + 𝐡 Β― 𝐡 < , I π‘š (cid:0) ( 𝐴 βˆ’ Β― 𝐴 ) + 𝐡 Β― 𝐡 (cid:1) > Ξ“ . (6)The first condition is the same as was derived in [4, 7]. The second term is a new one that wasnot considered before. From eq. (6) one can see, that neutrino quantum decoherence prevents asystem from an exponential growth of non-diagonal elements, i.e. neutrino quantum decoherenceleads to the damping of the neutrino collective oscillations.In this paper we considered for the first time the effect of the neutrino quantum decoherencein supernovae fluxes. We derive new conditions of the collective neutrino oscillations accountingfor neutrino quantum decoherence which can appear as a result of the physics beyond the StandardModel. This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research under Grant No.20-52-53022-GFEN-a. The work of KS was also supported by the Russian Foundation for BasicResearch under Grant No. 20-32-90107. References [1] K. Stankevich, A. Studenikin,

Neutrino quantum decoherence engendered by neutrino radia-tive decay , Phys. Rev. D (2020) no.5, 056004.[2] J. F. Nieves and S. Sahu, Phys. Rev. D (2020) no.5, 056007.[3] F. Capozzi, G. Raffelt, T. Stirner, JCAP (2019), 002.[4] D. Vaananen, G. McLaughlin, Phys. Rev. D (2016) no.10, 105044.[5] C. J. Stapleford, D. J. VÀÀnΓ€nen, J. P. Kneller, G. C. McLaughlin, B. T. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D (2016) no.9, 093007.[6] R. L. N. Oliveira, Eur. Phys. J. C (2016) no.7, 417.[7] D. Vaananen and C. Volpe, Phys. Rev. D88

Related Researches

Physical limits in the Color Dipole Model Bounds
by G.R.Boroun
Simulating collider physics on quantum computers using effective field theories
by Christian W. Bauer
A W Β± polarization analyzer from Deep Neural Networks
by Taegyun Kim
Loop-tree duality from vertices and edges
by William J. Torres Bobadilla
A geometrical approach to causality in multi-loop amplitudes
by German F. R. Sborlini
Dirac Neutrino Mass Matrix and its Link to Freeze-in Dark Matter
by Ernest Ma
Astrophysical neutrino oscillations accounting for neutrino charge radii
by Konstantin Kouzakov
Radiative Decays of Charged Leptons in the Seesaw Effective Field Theory with One-loop Matching
by Di Zhang
Exact accidental U(1) symmetries for the axion
by Luc DarmΓ©
Explaining the MiniBooNE Anomalous Excess via Leptophilic ALP-Sterile Neutrino Coupling
by Chia-Hung Vincent Chang
Global Searches for New Physics with Top Quarks
by Susanne Westhoff
Constraints on electromagnetic form factors of sub-GeV dark matter from the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropy
by Gaetano Lambiase
Exploring the new physics phases in 3+1 scenario in neutrino oscillation experiments
by Nishat Fiza
Infrared facets of the three-gluon vertex
by A. C. Aguilar
Top-pair production via gluon fusion in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory
by Christoph MΓΌller
An improved light-cone harmonic oscillator model for the pionic leading-twist distribution amplitude
by Tao Zhong
Charms of Strongly Interacting Conformal Gauge Mediation
by Gongjun Choi
Sensitivity of indirect detection of Neutralino dark matter by Sommerfeld enhancement mechanism
by Mikuru Nagayama
Heavy QCD Axion in b?οΏ½s transition: Enhanced Limits and Projections
by Sabyasachi Chakraborty
Leptonic CP and Flavor Violations in SUSY GUT with Right-handed Neutrinos
by Kaigo Hirao
Leptogenesis in an extended seesaw model with U(1 ) B?οΏ½L symmetry
by Ujjal Kumar Dey
Explicit Perturbations to the Stabilizer ?=i of Modular A ??5 Symmetry and Leptonic CP Violation
by Xin Wang
Testing new-physics models with global comparisons to collider measurements: the Contur toolkit
by A. Buckley
On the interference of ggH and c c Β― H Higgs production mechanisms and the determination of charm Yukawa coupling at the LHC
by Wojciech Bizon
Solving the Hubble tension without spoiling Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
by Guo-yuan Huang

  • «
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • »
Submitted on 9 Feb 2021 Updated

arXiv.org Original Source
INSPIRE HEP
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
How Researchain Works
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge