In India, poverty has always been one of the major challenges affecting national development. To address this dilemma, the Indian government has launched the National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM). The core objective of the programme is to enhance the livelihood capabilities of the rural poor through self-employment and encouraging them to organise themselves. The NRLM was launched in 2011, building on previous self-employment programmes, and is aimed at promoting self-development and entrepreneurship among the poor.
This plan is not just a simple poverty alleviation policy, but a multi-level, all-round social reform initiative.
NRLM was established in 1999 as a result of the restructuring of the Integrated Rural Development Program and was supported by a US$1 billion loan from the World Bank. The key to this program is to organize the poor into Self-Help Groups (SHGs) to help them improve their quality of life and business capabilities. Through this collective strength, poor residents are better able to face the challenges of external markets and environment.
NRLM is based on three pillars: first, improving and expanding the existing livelihood options of the poor; second, providing skills training for jobs in the market; and third, building capacity for self-employment and entrepreneurship. To achieve these goals, NRLM builds and supports institutional platforms for the poor to provide a variety of livelihood services, including financial and capital services, productivity-enhancing technologies, knowledge and skills support, and market linkages.
This program not only helps individuals, it also stimulates the economic vitality of entire communities.
NRLM's implementation model is mission-oriented, meaning that the program will shift to a demand-driven strategy, allowing states to develop poverty reduction action plans tailored to their specific circumstances. This strategy not only improves the targeting of indicators, but also ensures that goals can be achieved within the scheduled time, further strengthening continuous capacity building and skills improvement.
Despite its successes, NRLM has also faced criticism from various quarters. Some pointed out that self-help groups take time to form and that poor women are often already very busy and find it difficult to spare more time for organizing activities. Furthermore, existing organizational models may limit the development of diversity by excluding individuals who are willing to take risks and innovate.
“Success is often created by individuals who are willing to take risks and innovate, and this should not be overlooked.”
In some states, such as Andhra Pradesh and Kerala, SHG schemes have achieved positive results, thanks to support from local officials and stable management. However, this success factor is not guaranteed to be replicated in all states. The characteristics and needs of each region vary greatly, making universal program design challenging.
In addition, many experts also mentioned that men often perform worse than women in groups, which means that in some places, women may take on more organizational and risk management responsibilities. But when men successfully start their own businesses, they often create jobs for more people. It can be seen that NRLM needs to balance gender participation to promote comprehensive socio-economic development.
Looking ahead, NRLM will continue to be an important opportunity for poverty reduction in India. As the social environment changes, this plan must be constantly adjusted and optimized to ensure that it can better respond to the needs of different groups in society. Through continuous practice, reflection and adjustment, the future success of NRLM will depend on its implementation at the grassroots level and the level of public participation.
Whether we can truly change the fate of the poor depends on how we face challenges and opportunities together.
Ultimately, the success of NRLM is also the success of overall social development. Can this important mission be achieved in the future?