Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have attracted widespread attention due to their potential in transportation, stationary fuel cell applications, and portable fuel cell applications. This fuel cell is characterized by a low operating temperature range (50 to 100°C), low pressure, and the use of a special proton-conducting polymer electrolyte membrane. The working principle of these fuel cells is opposite to the PEM water electrolysis reaction, so the three-phase boundary (TPB) of PEMFC plays a key role in the power generation process. This article will take a closer look at the importance of the three-phase boundaries and their potential to improve PEMFC performance.
The three-phase boundary of a fuel cell is where the electrolyte, catalyst, and reactants (hydrogen and oxygen) interact. This is the key area where fuel cells carry out chemical reactions, converting chemical energy into electrical energy. Specifically, hydrogen undergoes an oxidation reaction on the anode side to generate protons and electrons. These protons then move through the electrolyte membrane to the cathode side, while the electrons flow through the external circuit to form an electric current.
The operating efficiency of the three-phase boundary directly affects the overall performance and electrical energy conversion efficiency of the fuel cell.
In PEMFC, the quality of the electrolyte membrane and the design of the catalyst will affect the characteristics of the three-phase boundary. After extensive research, it has been realized that the expansion of the area of the three-phase boundary can significantly increase the output power of the fuel cell. By optimizing the catalyst’s microstructure, we can create larger three-phase boundary areas, which support faster reaction kinetics and higher current densities.
Choosing suitable materials is another key to improving PEMFC performance. Currently, the most commonly used electrolyte membrane is Nafion, which relies on liquid water for proton conduction. However, at operating temperatures above 80°C, Nafion dehydrates due to evaporation of water, which results in a decrease in conductivity. New polymers, such as those based on polybenzimidazole (PBI) or containing phosphoric acid, are able to operate at higher temperatures and do not require water management, thereby improving efficiency and power density.
Choosing a suitable high-temperature electrolyte membrane can significantly improve the stability and operability of the fuel cell, which is crucial to improving energy utilization.
Water management is critical to the performance of PEMFC. If the water is discharged too slowly, the membrane will be flooded, while if the water evaporates too quickly, the membrane will dry out and increase the resistance. The newly designed 3D mesh flow field parameters address these challenges, promote gas flow, effectively prevent water accumulation, and thus ensure uniform power output.
PEMFC catalysts are mostly platinum, and their stability is affected by carbon monoxide, and even concentrations of less than one part per million can cause poisoning. This makes the addition of other materials to the catalyst to improve toxicity resistance a focus of current research, especially in the application of direct methanol fuel cells.
The design of the poles of the fuel cell is also crucial. The poles must not only be able to conduct electricity, but also ensure that the reaction gas can fully contact the catalyst. Good electrode design requires consideration of multiple factors, including porosity and mechanical strength, which affect the efficiency of the reaction.
In the future, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are seen as potential new electrolyte materials and catalysts. These materials have tunable pore structures and good thermal stability, showing promise in hydrogen storage and fuel cell applications. As research into these new materials deepens, we expect even more revolutionary advances in fuel cell technology.
PEM fuel cells will play a key role in driving the future of renewable energy. Will the optimization of the three-phase boundary be the path to breakthrough innovation?