A. Beaugerie

Prospective assessment and histological analysis of adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomies

OBJECTIVES The complexity of partial nephrectomy (PN) is partly anticipated by morphometric tumor-based scores that do not consider patient-related issues such as adherent perinephric fat (APF). Also, the objective is to prospectively assess the predictive factors of APF during PN, its effect on complications, and to correlate it to the histological reality. METHODS A total of 125 consecutive patients undergoing robotic or open PN were prospectively included. The Mayo adhesive probability score (MAP score) was compared to the peroperative presence of APF defined by a score≥2. Adipose tissue was analyzed histologically for fibrosis and inflammatory infiltrate of CD68+macrophages. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictive factors of APF, and outcomes were compared using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS APF was present in 51 patients (40.8%) and associated with slight longer operating time and increased blood loss. Warm ischemia time, margins, transfusion, and the Clavien-Dindo score were not different. In multivariate analysis, only male sex, age, waist circumference, fat density on computed tomography, and MAP score were significant predictors of APF. A radioclinical score was more predictive of APF than MAP score alone. Histologically, there was no macrophage infiltration but larger adipocytes in APF without significant differences in fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS APF can be accurately predicted using radioclinical data as the MAP score, combined with sex, age, and waist circumference. APF is associated with increased operative time and blood loss without postoperative complications. Histological analysis finds larger adipocytes in APF without inflammatory infiltrate, and no difference in fibrosis.

Pathological heterogeneity in sporadic synchronous renal tumors: Is the histological concordance predictable?

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the pathological concordance rate of multiple synchronous renal masses (MSRM) presumed to be sporadic and to analyze predictive factors of concordance. MATERIAL AND METHODS We identified from our institutional database patients with sporadic MSRM treated at our center between January 2000 and December 2015. All tumors were reviewed by a dedicated uropathologist. Pathological concordance rate was analyzed regarding clinical characteristics and preoperative imaging. RESULTS We included 112 patients: 50 had unilateral synchronous renal masses and 62 bilateral synchronous renal masses. A total of 291 tumors were analyzed, with an average of 2.6 tumors per patient. Overall, the malignant concordance rate was 91.6%, the pathological concordance rate was 67.3% and the grade concordance rate was 62.5%. In univariate analysis, predictive factors of histological concordance were bilateral synchronous renal masses (odds ratio [OR] = 3.39; 95% CI: 1.06-10.8; P = 0.04), age<60 years (OR = 3.04; 95% CI: 1.2-7.7; P = 0.02) and ≥3 lesions (OR = 2.41; 95% CI: 1.03-5.68; P = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, age<60 remained significantly associated with histological concordance (OR = 3.84; 95% CI: 1.24-11.9; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The histological concordance rate of MSRM is low. Age at diagnosis <60 years, bilateral lesions and ≥3 tumors are predictive factors of histological concordance, but the pathological diagnosis remains difficult to predict. This heterogeneity is important to take into account, particularly when choosing the treatment upon the renal biopsy results from a single lesion.