A. Braconi

Development, design and experimental validation of a steel self-centering device (SSCD) for seismic protection of buildings

The paper describes the development of an original steel self-centering device (SSCD) for improving the level of seismic protection of new and pre-existing structures. In particular, the proposed hysteretic device exhibits two technical features essential to protecting structures against the effects of an earthquake: re-centering and recovery of the structure’s original dissipative resources (Dissipative Elements) after a seismic event. The overall mechanical behavior of the hysteretic device was first defined in terms of its main internal components. A refined parametric analysis was then conducted by varying the mechanical properties of the steel elements responsible for seismic energy dissipation; this allowed optimizing the retrofitting/protection capacities of the system. To this end, various grades of steel, used not only in traditional structural engineering applications, but also in automotive engineering and packaging, were selected, and specimens of each subjected to experimental monotonic and cyclic tests to determine the most suitable for our purposes. A full-scale prototype SSCD was finally fabricated and checked through cyclic tests to evaluate its mechanical and dissipative performance.

INFLUENCE OF STEEL MECHANICAL PROPERTIES ON EBF SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR

Among the resisting systems suitable for the design of ductile steel structures, Eurocode 8 proposes MRFs and EBFs. The formers are considered more efficient in terms of ductility, but they suffer a strong weakness in the lateral stiffness, with following cumbersome design procedures to avoid excessive lateral displacements maintaining a quite high ductile behaviour under seismic actions. Often, the design process leads to not optimized structural members, oversized with respect to the minimum seismic requirements due to lateral deformation limitations. EBFs combine high lateral stiffness, due to bracing elements, and high dissipative capacities, provided by the plastic hinges developed in links. Eurocode 8 proposes a design procedure for EBF structures in which iterative checks are required to design links with a defined level resistance dependent on all the other links’ strength. The present paper investigates the seismic behaviour of EBFs using Incremental Dynamic Analyses (IDA) to explore their mechanical response under increasing seismic action. IDAs are executed considering the influence of variability of steel mechanical properties on the behaviour of EBFs, using seven artificial accelerograms according to Eurocode 8. The aims of IDAs are the probabilistic assessment of the response of the system with respect to the variability of the material properties, the analysis of structural safety and the ability of the structures to internally redistribute plastic phenomena during the earthquake. Structural safety conditions will be defined according to a multi-level performance approach. The paper presents also some final suggestions for possible improvements and design simplifications.

Influence of variability of material mechanical properties on seismic performance of steel and steel–concrete composite structures

Modern standards for constructions in seismic zones allow the construction of buildings able to dissipate the energy of the seismic input through an appropriate location of cyclic plastic deformations involving the largest possible number of structural elements, forming thus a global collapse mechanisms without failure and instability phenomena both at local and global level. The key instrument for this purpose is the capacity design approach, which requires an appropriate selection of the design forces and an accurate definition of structural details within the plastic hinges zones, prescribing at the same time the oversizing of non-dissipative elements that shall remain in the elastic field during the earthquake. However, the localization of plastic hinges and the development of the global collapse mechanism is strongly influenced by the mechanical properties of materials, which are characterized by an inherent randomness. This variability can alter the final structural behaviour not matching the expected performance. In the present paper, the influence of the variability of material mechanical properties on the structural behaviour of steel and steel/concrete composite buildings is analyzed, evaluating the efficiency of the capacity design approach as proposed by Eurocode 8 and the possibility of introducing an upper limitation to the nominal yielding strength adopted in the design.

Seismic demand on steel reinforcing bars in reinforced concrete frame structures

Modern design standards for reinforced concrete (r.c.) buildings allow the achievement of ductile structures, able to globally dissipate seismic energy through the development of plastic deformations located in the dissipative regions (i.e. plastic hinges). The hysteretic capacity of r.c. structures is related to the ability of reinforcing steel bars to sustain many cycles of high plastic deformations without the exhibition significant decrease of strength and stiffness; this condition, typically due to cyclic/seismic action, shall be widely investigated in order to obtain a full and detailed knowledge of the structural behaviour of modern r.c. buildings. In the present paper, elaborated inside the European research project “Rusteel”, the evaluation of the seismic ductile demand on steel reinforcing bars due to real earthquake events was carried out. Representative r.c. case study buildings were designed following the actual European and Italian prescriptions and analyzed using the Incremental Dynamic Analysis technique for the assessment of the behaviour under real seismic events. The elaboration of a simplified mechanical model for the steel reinforcing bars, calibrated on the basis of experimental monotonic and cyclic tests, allowed the evaluation of the effective level of deformation and energy dissipation required by earthquakes and the assessment of the ability of the actual European production to satisfy the effective seismic ductile requirements.