Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where A. C. Lynch is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by A. C. Lynch.


British Journal of Surgery | 2014

Quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes following exenteration for pelvic malignancy

Jane M. Young; Tim Badgery-Parker; Lindy Masya; Madeleine King; Cherry E. Koh; A. C. Lynch; Alexander G. Heriot; Michael J. Solomon

Pelvic exenteration is highly radical surgery offering the only potential cure for locally advanced pelvic cancer. This study compared quality of life and other relevant patient‐reported outcomes over 12 months for patients who did and those who did not undergo pelvic exenteration.


Colorectal Disease | 2015

Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review

J. E. Ryan; Satish K. Warrier; A. C. Lynch; Robert G. Ramsay; Wayne A. Phillips; Alexander G. Heriot

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is found in 20% of patients with rectal cancer undergoing long‐course chemoradiotherapy. Some authors have suggested that these patients do not need to undergo surgery and can be managed with careful follow‐up, with surgery only used in the event of clinical failure. Widespread adoption of this regimen is limited by the accuracy of methods to confirm a pathological complete response (pCR).


Diseases of The Colon & Rectum | 2011

Metabolic response of rectal cancer assessed by 18-FDG PET following chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for patient outcome.

Justin Yeung; Victor Kalff; Rodney J. Hicks; Elizabeth Drummond; Emma Link; Y. Taouk; Michael Michael; S. Ngan; A. C. Lynch; Alexander G. Heriot

BACKGROUND: Complete pathological response has proven prognostic benefits in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Sequential 18-FDG PET may be an early surrogate for pathological response to chemoradiotherapy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify whether metabolic response measured by FDG PET following chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for tumor recurrence and survival following neoadjuvant therapy and surgical treatment for primary rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with primary rectal cancer treated by long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery had FDG PET performed before and 4 weeks after treatment, before surgical resection was performed. Retrospective chart review was undertaken for patient demographics, tumor staging, recurrence rates, and survival. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2007, 78 patients were identified (53 male, 25 female; median age, 64 y). After chemoradiotherapy, 37 patients (47%) had a complete metabolic response, 26 (33%) had a partial metabolic response, and 14 (18%) had no metabolic response as assessed by FDG PET (1 patient had missing data). However, only 4 patients (5%) had a complete pathological response. The median postoperative follow-up period was 3.1 years during which 14 patients (19%) had a recurrence: 2 local, 9 distant, and 3 with both local and distant. The estimated percentage without recurrence was 77% at 5 years (95% CI 66%–89%). There was an inverse relationship between FDG PET metabolic response and the incidence of recurrence within 3 years (P = .04). Kaplan-Meier analysis of FDG PET metabolic response and overall survival demonstrated a significant difference in survival among patients in the 3 arms: complete, partial, and no metabolic response (P = .04); the patients with complete metabolic response had the best prognosis. CONCLUSION: Complete or partial metabolic response on PET following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery predicts a lower local recurrence rate and improved survival compared with patients with no metabolic response. Metabolic response may be used to stratify prognosis in patients with rectal cancer.


Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2009

The Role of Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Solid Tumors

Anita R. Skandarajah; A. C. Lynch; John Mackay; S. Ngan; Alexander G. Heriot

BackgroundCombined multimodality therapy is becoming standard treatment for many solid tumors, but the role of intraoperative radiotherapy in the management of solid tumors remains uncertain. The aim is to review the indication, application, and outcomes of intraoperative radiotherapy in the management of nongynecological solid tumors.MethodsA literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane database for studies between 1965 and 2008 assessing intraoperative radiotherapy, using the keywords “intraoperative radiotherapy,” “colorectal cancer,” “breast cancer,” “gastric cancer,” “pancreatic cancer,” “soft tissue tumor,” and “surgery.” Only publications in English with available abstracts and regarding adult humans were included, and the evidence was critically evaluated.ResultsOur search retrieved 864 publications. After exclusion of nonclinical papers, duplicated papers and exclusion of brachytherapy papers, 77 papers were suitable to assess the current role of intraoperative radiotherapy. The clinical application and evidence base of intraoperative radiotherapy for each cancer is presented.ConclusionsCurrent studies in all common cancers show an additional benefit in local recurrence rates when intraoperative radiotherapy is included in the multimodal treatment. However, intraoperative radiotherapy may not improve overall survival and has significant morbidity depending on the site of the tumor. Intraoperative radiotherapy does have a role in the multidisciplinary management of solid tumors, but further studies are required to more precisely determine the extent of benefit.Combined multimodality therapy is becoming standard treatment for many solid tumors, but the role of intraoperative radiotherapy in the management of solid tumors remains uncertain. The aim is to review the indication, application, and outcomes of intraoperative radiotherapy in the management of nongynecological solid tumors. A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane database for studies between 1965 and 2008 assessing intraoperative radiotherapy, using the keywords “intraoperative radiotherapy,” “colorectal cancer,” “breast cancer,” “gastric cancer,” “pancreatic cancer,” “soft tissue tumor,” and “surgery.” Only publications in English with available abstracts and regarding adult humans were included, and the evidence was critically evaluated. Our search retrieved 864 publications. After exclusion of nonclinical papers, duplicated papers and exclusion of brachytherapy papers, 77 papers were suitable to assess the current role of intraoperative radiotherapy. The clinical application and evidence base of intraoperative radiotherapy for each cancer is presented. Current studies in all common cancers show an additional benefit in local recurrence rates when intraoperative radiotherapy is included in the multimodal treatment. However, intraoperative radiotherapy may not improve overall survival and has significant morbidity depending on the site of the tumor. Intraoperative radiotherapy does have a role in the multidisciplinary management of solid tumors, but further studies are required to more precisely determine the extent of benefit.


Annals of Surgery | 2016

The Outcomes and Patterns of Treatment Failure After Surgery for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Craig Harris; Michael J. Solomon; Alexander G. Heriot; P. M. Sagar; Paris P. Tekkis; Liane Dixon; Rebecca Pascoe; Bruce Dobbs; Chris Frampton; D. P. Harji; Christos Kontovounisios; Kirk K. S. Austin; Cherry E. Koh; Peter J. Lee; A. C. Lynch; Satish K. Warrier; Frank A. Frizelle

Objective: To assess the outcomes and patterns of treatment failure of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent rectal cancer. Background: Despite advances in the management of rectal cancer, local recurrence still occurs. For appropriately selected patients, pelvic exenteration surgery can achieve long-term disease control. Methods: Prospectively maintained databases of 5 high volume institutions for pelvic exenteration surgery were reviewed and data combined. We assessed the combined endpoints of overall 5-year survival, cancer-specific 5-year mortality, local recurrence, and the development of metastatic disease. Results: Five hundred thirty-three patients who had undergone surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer were identified. Five-year cancer-specific survival for patients with a complete (R0) resection is 44%, which was achieved in 59% of patients. For those with R1 and R2 resections, the 5-year survival was 26% and 10%, respectively. Radical resection required sacrectomy in 170 patients (32%), and total cystectomy in 105 patients (20%). Treatment failure included local recurrence alone in 75 patients (14%) and systemic metastases with or without local recurrence in 226 patients (42%). Chemoradiotherapy before exenteration was associated with a significant (P < 0.05) improvement in overall 5-year cancer-specific survival for those patients with an R0 resection. Postoperative chemotherapy did not alter outcomes. Conclusions: R0 resection of the pelvic recurrence is the most significant factor affecting overall and disease-free survival. The surgery is complex and often highly morbid, and where possible patients should be given perioperative chemoradiotherapy. Further investigations are required to determine the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.


Colorectal Disease | 2015

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI and endorectal ultrasound in the restaging and response assessment of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy.

Sameer Memon; A. C. Lynch; Mathias Bressel; Alan G Wise; Alexander G. Heriot

Restaging imaging by MRI or endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not routinely performed, but the assessment of response is becoming increasingly important to facilitate individualization of management.


Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery | 2016

Surgery for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls.

Satish K. Warrier; Alexander G. Heriot; A. C. Lynch

Rectal cancer can recur locally in up to 10% of the patients who undergo definitive resection for their primary cancer. Surgical salvage is considered appropriate in the curative setting as well as select cases with palliative intent. Disease-free survival following salvage resection is dependent upon achieving an R0 resection margin. A clear understanding of applied surgical anatomy, appropriate preoperative planning, and a multidisciplinary approach to aggressive soft tissue, bony, and vascular resection with appropriate reconstruction is necessary. Technical tips, tricks, and pitfalls that may assist in managing these cancers are discussed and the roles of additional boost radiation and intraoperative radiation therapy in the management of such cancers are also discussed.


World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 2016

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of the rectum: An update and implications for treatment

Glen R. Guerra; Cherng H Kong; Satish K. Warrier; A. C. Lynch; Alexander G. Heriot; S. Ngan

AIM To provide an update on the aetiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, staging and management of rectal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE was performed with the reference list of selected articles reviewed to ensure all relevant publications were captured. The search strategy was limited to the English language, spanning from 1946 to 2015. A qualitative analysis was undertaken examining patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, staging, treatment and outcome. The quantitaive analysis was limited to data extracted on treatment and outcomes including radiological, clinical and pathological complete response where available. The narrative and quantitative review were synthesised in concert. RESULTS The search identified 487 articles in total with 79 included in the qualitative review. The quantitative analysis involved 63 articles, consisting of 43 case reports and 20 case series with a total of 142 individual cases. The underlying pathogenesis of rectal SCC while unclear, continues to be defined, with increasing evidence of a metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence and a possible role for human papilloma virus in this progression. The presentation is similar to rectal adenocarcinoma, with a diagnosis confirmed by endoscopic biopsy. Many presumed rectal SCCs are in fact an extension of an anal SCC, and cytokeratin markers are a useful adjunct in this distinction. Staging is most accurately reflected by the tumour-node-metastasis classification for rectal adenocarcinoma. It involves examining locoregional disease by way of magnetic resonance imaging and/or endorectal ultrasound, with systemic spread excluded by way of computed tomography. Positron emission tomography is integral in the workup to exclude an external site of primary SCC with metastasis to the rectum. While the optimal treatment remains as yet undefined, recent studies have demonstrated a global shift away from surgery towards definitive chemoradiotherapy as primary treatment. Pooled overall survival was calculated to be 86% in patients managed with chemoradiation compared with 48% for those treated traditionally with surgery. Furthermore, local recurrence and metastatic rates were 25% vs 10% and 30% vs 13% for the chemoradiation vs conventional treatment cohorts. CONCLUSION The changing paradigm in the treatment of rectal SCC holds great promise for improved outcomes in this rare disease.


Colorectal Disease | 2014

No increase in colorectal cancer in patients under 50 years of age: a Victorian experience from the last decade

Christopher Sb Sia; Eldho Paul; Roger Wale; A. C. Lynch; Alexander G. Heriot; Satish K. Warrier

The study aimed to assess whether there has been an increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) among young patients in Victoria and whether such cancers are more advanced at presentation.


Colorectal Disease | 2016

A case series of anal melanoma including the results of treatment with imatinib in selected patients.

J. Knowles; A. C. Lynch; Satish K. Warrier; Michael A. Henderson; Alexander G. Heriot

Anal melanoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis.

Collaboration


Dive into the A. C. Lynch's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander G. Heriot

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Satish K. Warrier

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Ngan

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert G. Ramsay

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cherry E. Koh

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Mackay

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie Chu

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kate Burbury

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Solomon

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge