A. Camuglia

Cardiac catheterization is associated with superior outcomes for survivors of out of hospital cardiac arrest: review and meta-analysis.

AIMS Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Invasive cardiac assessment with coronary angiography offers the potential for improving outcomes by facilitating early revascularization. The aim of the present study was to review the published data on early coronary angiography for survivors of OHCA, and its impact on survival and neurological outcomes. METHODS Medline, Embase and PubMed were searched with a structured search query. The primary outcome was in-hospital (or if not available, 30 day or 6 month) survival. Rates of survival with good neurological outcome were a secondary endpoint. The time period of the search was from 1 January 1980 to 1 January 2014. Data was pooled with means and 95% CI interval calculated. Meta-analysis of the main outcomes was performed using a weighted random effects model. RESULTS Following review of all identified records, 105 relevant full text articles were retrieved. Fifty had adequate outcome information stratified by the use of coronary angiography for analysis. In studies where a control group was available for comparison, the overall survival in the acute angiography group was 58.8% versus 30.9% in the control group (Odds ratio 2.77, 95% CI 2.06-3.72). Survival with good neurological outcome (as per the Utstein framework) in the early angiography group was 58% versus 35.8% in the control group (Odds ratio 2.20, 95% CI 1.46-3.32). CONCLUSIONS Early coronary angiography in patients following OHCA is associated with improved outcome and better survival.

Remote Ischemic Postconditioning During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Remote Ischemic Postconditioning–Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Randomized Trial

Background—Remote ischemic preconditioning may result in reduction in infarct size during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is unclear whether remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPost) will reduce the incidence of myocardial injury after PCI, and whether ischemic conditioning of a larger remote organ (thigh versus arm) would provide further myocardial protection. Methods and Results—We randomized 360 patients presenting with stable or unstable angina (28% of patients) and negative Troponin T at baseline to 3 groups: 2 groups received RIPost (induced by ischemia to upper or lower limb), and a third was the control group. RIPost was applied during PCI immediately after stent deployment, by three 5-minute cycles of blood pressure cuff inflation to >200 mm Hg in the arm or thigh (20 mm Hg in the control) with 5-minute breaks between each cycle. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with Troponin T levels >3×ULN postprocedure (at 6 or 18–24 hours), where ULN stands for upper limit of normal. A total of 120 patients were randomized to each group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the 3 groups. The primary outcome occurred in 30%, 35%, and 35% of the arm, thigh, and control groups, respectively (P=0.64). There were no differences in creatine kinase or high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels after PCI or in the incidence of acute kidney injury between the groups. Conclusions—RIPost during PCI did not reduce the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury. Similar effect was obtained when remote ischemia was induced to the upper or lower limb. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00970827.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with comparable clinical outcomes to open aortic valve surgery but with a reduced length of in-patient hospital stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND Aortic valve replacement is indicated in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has evolved as a potential strategy in a growing proportion of patients in preference to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This meta-analysis aims to assess the differential outcomes of TAVR and SAVR in patients enrolled in published randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS A systematic literature search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, OVID, and PubMed MEDLINE was performed. Randomised controlled trials of patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR compared with SAVR were included. Clinical outcomes and procedural complications were assessed. RESULTS Five RCTs with a total of 3,828 patients (1,928 TAVR and 1,900 SAVR) were analysed. There was no statistically significant difference in combined rates of all-cause mortality and stroke at 30-days for TAVR vs SAVR (6.3% vs 7.5%; OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.64-1.08; P=0.17) or at 12 months (17.2% vs 19.2%; OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.73-1.03; P=0.29). No statistically significant difference was seen for death or stroke separately at any time point although a numerical trend in favour of TAVR for both was recorded. Length of in-patient stay was significantly less with TAVR vs SAVR (9.6 +/- 7.7 days vs 12.2 +/- 8.8 days; OR -2.94; 95% CI: -4.64 to -1.24; P=0.0007). Major vascular complications were more frequent in patients undergoing TAVR vs SAVR (8.2% vs. 4.0%; OR 2.15; 95% CI: 1.62-2.86; P <0.00001) but major bleeding was more common among SAVR patients (20.5% vs 44.2%; OR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.22-0.52; P=<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and SAVR are associated with overall similar rates of death and stroke among patients in intermediate to high-risk cohorts but with reduced length of in-patient hospital stay.

Short-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with direct bioresorbable scaffold deployment.

BACKGROUND Direct coronary stenting is a validated therapeutic option for coronary lesions. We studied the feasibility of direct deployment with a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS Demographic, procedural, and survival data were obtained for patients who had direct scaffold deployment with BVS from 1 May 2013 to 1 April 2014. RESULTS We performed a retrospective review of nine patients which included eight patients having ST-elevation myocardial infarction. There were no cases of worsening coronary flow, scaffold thrombosis, target lesion revascularization or death up to 30 days post intervention. CONCLUSION Direct BVS deployment in ACS appears safe and feasible.

Pre-hospital fibrinolysis in the management of patients with ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: review of the evidence, implementation and future directions.

Time to reperfusion is among the strongest predictors of clinical outcome in patients who present with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction. When time to access is equivalent, primary percutaneous coronary intervention has demonstrated superior outcomes to fibrinolysis. However, where significant delays exist in accessing percutaneous intervention, fibrinolysis has an important role. The potential for fibrinolysis delivery in the pre-hospital setting means that delays to primary percutaneous intervention need to be considered from the time that the patient becomes eligible for fibrinolysis in the field. This can be particularly challenging in patients with symptom duration ofless than two hours, as some evidence suggests fibrinolysis may be particularly beneficial in this early phase. Additionally, access to primary percutaneous intervention provided by an experienced operator, in a timely manner at any time of the day or night, is not an available option in many healthcare settings. This review focuses on the current evidence and practice of pre-hospital fibrinolysis and assesses potential roles for this therapy in the future.

Drug Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts for Left Main Coronary Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Review Of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND Revascularisation of left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease can be potentially managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) data have added to the literature on this subject and this meta-analysis aims to assess the state of the data to assist in guiding patient treatment decisions. METHODS A systematic literature search of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, OVID, and PubMed Medline was performed. Randomised controlled trials of patients with LMCA disease undergoing PCI with drug eluting stents or CABG were included. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were assessed and analysed. RESULTS Four suitable RCTs of adequate quality and follow-up were identified. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 3 to 5 years of follow-up was significantly increased with PCI compared to CABG (23.3% vs 18.2%, OR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.18-1.58; p=<0.0001; I2=0%) and was largely driven by more repeat revascularisation procedures among patients treated with PCI. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke (either individually or when these outcomes were combined as a composite endpoint). CONCLUSIONS Coronary artery bypass grafting and PCI both represent reasonable treatment modalities for LMCA disease in appropriately selected patients. However, where CABG is feasible it offers superior long-term freedom from repeat revascularisation. Longer-term follow-up is required to further clarify the durability of mortality outcomes, especially in patients treated with PCI.

The potential role of anticoagulant therapy for the secondary prevention of ischemic events post-acute coronary syndrome

Abstract The use of dual antiplatelet therapy has led to a substantial reduction in ischemic events post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite this, recurrent event rates remain high. Recent research has combined antiplatelet with anticoagulant therapy to reduce recurrent event rates further. Compared with standard medical therapy, rivaroxaban demonstrated improved efficacy outcomes and significantly reduced mortality after an ACS. Although clear benefits of novel oral anticoagulants post-ACS have been proven, concerns regarding bleeding are still a barrier to widespread use. This review explores key trials of dual antiplatelet therapy and examines the latest research in anticoagulation aiming to optimize clinical outcomes post-ACS.

Improving the Utility of Coronary Angiography: The Use of Adjuvant Imaging and Physiological Assessment

The most important role of coronary angiography is to delineate coronary lesions that cause inducible ischaemia. It remains the primary tool influencing the decision to undertake revas‐ cularization and patient outcomes [1] [2-4]. However, there are inherent limitations to diag‐ nostic angiography. These pitfalls include difficulties delineating eccentric plaque (that can be underappreciated in the absence of multiple angiographic views), difficulty assessing le‐ sions of moderate severity, the assessment of overall plaque burden and the composition, appreciation of ostial lesions, culprit lesion assessment in acute infarct patients and side branch analysis in bifurcation lesions. Heavily calcified lesions can also produce hazy angio‐ graphic appearances which often leaves the operator at a loss to determine the actual true lumen path and in some circumstances even misdiagnose calcification as “pseudothrom‐ bus” [5]. This latter phenomenon significantly changes the approach to intervention. The ar‐ tery can be put at risk of perforation in the absence of adequate lesion preparation or wire induced dissection as calcified plaque is often undermined, complex and much more diffi‐ cult to wire than soft thrombus.