A. Cerra-Franco

Undetected lymph node metastases in presumed early stage NSCLC SABR patients

ABSTRACT Introduction: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT, also called stereotactic ablative body radiation SABR) is the treatment of choice for many patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those who are unfit for surgery or refuse surgery. Areas covered: In an effort to develop optimal staging for the evaluation of SBRT candidates, we review the performance of available lymph node staging methods, as well as risk factors for lymph node involvement. Pubmed was searched to identify relevant literature. Current staging methods for NSCLC, including Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography(PET/CT) and endobronchial ultra sound (EBUS), have limited sensitivities. Expert commentary: There are several factors, including primary tumor location, tumor size, and histology that are possibly associated with the sensitivity of PET/CT to detect mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Small lymph node metastases typically remain undetected by PET/CT. Therefore invasive nodal staging procedures are indicated for most presumed early-stage NSCLC patients, but these also have limited sensitivity. Occult lymph node metastasis is associated with adverse outcome in NSCLC. Moreover, there is overwhelming evidence that certain patients who have lymph node metastases detected at the time of surgery derive an overall survival benefit from adjuvant therapies. It remains to be determined if improved detection of lymph node metastases in SABR candidates can indeed improve prognosis.

Histology, Tumor Volume, and Radiation Dose Predict Outcomes in NSCLC Patients After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

Introduction: It remains unclear if histology should be independently considered when choosing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy dose prescriptions for NSCLC. Methods: The study population included 508 patients with 561 lesions between 2000 and 2016, of which 442 patients with 482 lesions had complete dosimetric information. Eligible patients had histologically or clinically diagnosed early‐stage NSCLC and were treated with 3 to 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was in‐field tumor control censored by either death or progression. Involved lobe control was also assessed. Results: At 6.7 years median follow‐up, 3‐year in‐field control, involved lobe control, overall survival, and progression‐free survival rates were 88.1%, 80.0%, 49.4%, and 37.2%, respectively. Gross tumor volume (GTV) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01 per mL, p = 0.0044) and histology (p = 0.0225) were independently associated with involved lobe failure. GTV (HR = 1.013, p = 0.001) and GTV dose (cutoff of 110 Gy, biologically effective dose with &agr;/&bgr; = 10 [BED10], HR = 2.380, p = 0.0084) were independently associated with in‐field failure. For squamous cell carcinomas, lower prescription doses were associated with worse in‐field control (12 Gy × 4 or 10 Gy × 5 versus 18 Gy or 20 Gy × 3: HR = 3.530, p = 0.0447, confirmed by propensity score matching) and was independent of GTV (HR = 1.014 per mL, 95% confidence interval: 1.005–1.022, p = 0.0012). For adenocarcinomas, there were no differences in in‐field control observed using the above dose groupings (p = 0.12 and p = 0.31, respectively). Conclusions: In the absence of level I data, GTV and histology should be considered to personalize radiation dose for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. We suggest lower prescription doses (i.e., 12 Gy × 4 or 10 G × 5) should be avoided for squamous cell carcinomas if normal tissue tolerances are met.

Superior vena cava syndrome in a patient with locally advanced lung cancer with good response to definitive chemoradiation: a case report

BackgroundThe incidence of superior vena cava syndrome within the United States is roughly 15,000 cases per year. Superior vena cava syndrome is a potentially life-threatening medical condition; however, superior vena cava syndrome is not fatal in the majority of cases. Superior vena cava syndrome encompasses a collection of signs and symptoms resulting from obstruction of the superior vena cava, including swelling of the upper body of the head, neck, arms, and/or breast. It is also associated with cyanosis, plethora, and distended subcutaneous vessels. Lung cancer, including both non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer, is the most common extrinsic cause of superior vena cava syndrome. Intrinsic disruption of superior vena cava flow can also precipitate superior vena cava syndrome. This case report describes an unusual presentation and potential etiology of superior vena cava syndrome.Case presentationOur patient was a 51-year-old black woman with locally advanced, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer who had no clinical symptoms of superior vena cava syndrome at the time of diagnosis. However, she did have radiographic evidence of superior vena cava stenosis caused by extrinsic compression from her large right hilar primary tumor. She was treated with definitive chemoradiation, receiving 60xa0Gy of external beam radiation therapy given concurrently with chemotherapy. Three months after completion of radiotherapy, she developed signs of superior vena cava syndrome, including breast and supraclavicular swelling. She had a chest computed tomography scan showing over 50% reduction in the size of a right hilar mass; however, she had continued radiographic stenosis of the superior vena cava. The distribution of stenosis appeared to be inferior to the caudal extent of pretreatment tumor volume. She had no other radiographic indications for superior vena cava syndrome.ConclusionsGenerally, superior vena cava syndrome is the result of extrinsic compression of the superior vena cava by tumor. Our patient’s case represents the development of superior vena cava syndrome after an excellent response of tumor with near-complete tumor response. We suspect chemoradiation therapy as a potential etiology for the precipitation of the superior vena cava syndrome, which is currently not well reported in the medical literature.

Congenital ichthyosis patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin who received concurrent chemoradiation: A case report

Ichthyosis is a heterogeneous cluster of keratinization disorders. Autosomal dominant ichthyosis vulgaris, the most common type, has an estimated incidence of 1 in 250 births, and X-linked recessive ichthyosis, the second most common form, has an incidence of 1 in 6000 male births. In addition, there are approximately 6.7 in 100,000 cases of moderate-to-severe ichthyosis. Congenital ichthyoses are caused by mutations in the genes responsible for keratinocyte differentiation and skin barrier function. To date, there are 36 known forms of inherited ichthyoses, with over 25 genes being implicated and multiple mutations for each gene. In ichthyosis vulgaris, mutation of the filaggrin gene leads to a paucity or absence of the granular layer of the epidermis. This results in abnormal epidermal hyperplasia with excessive formation of stratum corneum, accompanied by abnormal desquamation. The main clinical feature of this disease is dry and rough skin with marked scaling but without inflammation. The skin of the abdomen and extensor surfaces is the most commonly affected, but the skin of the face and flexor surfaces is often spared. There is limited data on how patients with ichthyosis tolerate radiation therapy. Here we describe a case of a patient with congenital ichthyosis who underwent a course of radiation therapy concurrently with chemotherapy for treatment of squamous cell cancer of the skin.