Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where A.D. Findley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by A.D. Findley.


Fertility and Sterility | 2013

Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial

A.D. Findley; M.T. Siedhoff; K.A. Hobbs; John F. Steege; E.T. Carey; Christina A. McCall; Anne Z. Steiner

OBJECTIVE To examine the short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve when ovarian preservation is planned in view of determining the feasibility of conducting the study on a larger scale. DESIGN Pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING Tertiary care, academic medical center. PATIENT(S) Thirty premenopausal women aged 18 to 45 years undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian preservation for benign indications from April 2012 to September 2012. INTERVENTION(S) Bilateral salpingectomy (n = 15) versus no salpingectomy (n = 15) at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian preservation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Antimüllerian hormone (AMH) measured preoperatively, at 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively, and at 3 months postoperatively, with operative time and estimated blood loss abstracted from the medical records. RESULT(S) The mean AMH levels were not statistically significantly different at baseline (2.26 vs. 2.25 ng/ml), 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively (1.03 vs. 1.25 ng/ml), or 3 months postoperatively (1.86 vs. 1.82 ng/ml) among women with salpingectomy versus no salpingectomy, respectively. There was also no statistically significant temporal change in the mean AMH level from baseline to 3 months postoperatively (-0.07 vs. -0.08 ng/ml) between the two groups. No difference in operative time (116 vs. 115 minutes) or estimated blood loss (70 vs. 91 mL) was observed. CONCLUSION(S) Salpingectomy at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy with ovarian preservation is a safe procedure that does not appear to have any short-term deleterious effects on ovarian reserve, as measured by AMH level. Conducting a trial of this nature that is adequately powered with long-term follow-up evaluation would be feasible and is required to definitively confirm these results.


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2011

Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy.

M.T. Siedhoff; E.T. Carey; A.D. Findley; Lauren E. Riggins; Joanne M. Garrett; John F. Steege

STUDY OBJECTIVE To estimate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on several outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy, in particular in the extremes of obesity. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING Tertiary-care university-based teaching hospital. PATIENTS Eight hundred thirty-four patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy from January 2007 to October 2011. INTERVENTION Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were abstracted from medical records. The primary outcome was a composite index score that took into account operative time, nonsurgical operating room time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, number of complications, and severity of complications according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. We individually examined elements of the composite index as a secondary outcome. Models were developed to assess the association of BMI with the composite index score and the components of the index, controlling for age, presence of diabetes, tobacco use, surgeon, type of hysterectomy (total vs supracervical), use of robotics, uterine weight, number of additional procedures performed, presence of adhesions requiring lysis, and deeply infiltrating endometriosis as potential confounders. Mean (SD) BMI was 31.4 (8.1). Mean (SD) uterine weight was 345 (388) g. Mean operative time was 150 (61) minutes. Increasing BMI was associated with a worse composite score (p < .01); longer operative time (p = .03), nonsurgical operating room time (p = .02), and total operating room time (p < .01); greater estimated blood loss (p < .01); and complication severity (p = .01). CONCLUSION These data suggest that there is a significant association of BMI with surgical outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy, and the effect is most pronounced in the morbidly obese. These patients may stand to gain the greatest differential benefit from a laparoscopic approach to surgery. However, they should be properly counseled about the challenge that obesity poses to the operation.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2014

Mechanical bowel preparation before laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial

M.T. Siedhoff; Leslie H. Clark; K.A. Hobbs; A.D. Findley; Janelle K. Moulder; Joanne M. Garrett

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of mechanical bowel preparation on surgical field visualization during laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: The studys primary outcome was the percentage of operations rated “good” or “excellent” in terms of surgical field visualization at the outset of the case by the primary surgeon. Additional measures included assessment of visualization during the case and patient perioperative comfort. The study was powered to detect a 20% absolute difference in the proportion of cases rated as “good” or “excellent.” RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were assigned to mechanical bowel preparation and 73 to no mechanical bowel preparation. The groups were comparable regarding patient and surgery characteristics. No differences were found for this rating between groups (mechanical bowel preparation, 64 of 73 patients [87.7%], compared with no mechanical bowel preparation, 60 of 73 patients [82.2%], P=.36). Surgeons guessed patient assignment correctly 59% of the time (42 of 71 patients) with mechanical bowel preparation and 55% of the time (41 of 75 patients) with no mechanical bowel preparation. CONCLUSION: Mechanical bowel preparation is well-tolerated but does not influence surgical field visualization for laparoscopic hysterectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinialTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01576965. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2014

Post-hysterectomy Dyspareunia

M.T. Siedhoff; Et Carey; A.D. Findley; K.A. Hobbs; Janelle K. Moulder; John F. Steege

When appropriately performed, hysterectomy most often contributes substantially to quality of life. Postoperative morbidity is minimal, in particular after minimally invasive surgery. In a minority of women, pain during intercourse is one of the more long-lasting sequelae of the procedure. Complete evaluation and treatment of this complication requires a thorough understanding of the status and function of neighboring organ systems and structures (urinary system, gastrointestinal tract, and pelvic and hip muscle groups). Successful resolution of dyspareunia often may be facilitated with review of the patients previous degree of comfort during sex and the nature of her relationship with her partner. Repeat surgery is needed in a small minority of patients.


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2018

Chronic Pelvic Pain Experience among Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Fellows

M. Dassel; Janelle K. Moulder; Et Carey; A.D. Findley; J. Carrillo


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2014

Cornual Placenta Accreta Managed by Postpartum Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

M.T. Siedhoff; Dana M. Smith; Quinn K. Lippmann; A.D. Findley; John F. Steege; Neeta L. Vora


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2013

Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy

J.K. Moulder; A.D. Findley; K.A. Hobbs; M.T. Siedhoff


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2013

Predictors of Pain and Recovery Time after Benign Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery

K.A. Hobbs; K.E. Hacker; A.D. Findley; M.T. Siedhoff


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2013

Mechanical Bowel Preparation before Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

M.T. Siedhoff; Leslie H. Clark; A.D. Findley; K.A. Hobbs; E.T. Carey


Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology | 2013

TLH BSO with Bowel Resection for Advanced Endometriosis Using a “Dental Floss Dunk” Technique

M.T. Siedhoff; A.D. Findley; K.A. Hobbs

Collaboration


Dive into the A.D. Findley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M.T. Siedhoff

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K.A. Hobbs

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E.T. Carey

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John F. Steege

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christina A. McCall

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Et Carey

University of Kansas

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janelle K. Moulder

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Z. Steiner

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joanne M. Garrett

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leslie H. Clark

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge