A.D. van Zuilen

Pretransplant Donor-Specific HLA Class-I and -II Antibodies Are Associated With an Increased Risk for Kidney Graft Failure

Pretransplant risk assessment of graft failure is important for donor selection and choice of immunosuppressive treatment. We examined the relation between kidney graft failure and presence of IgG donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA) or C1q‐fixing DSA, detected by single antigen bead array (SAB) in pretransplant sera from 837 transplantations. IgG‐DSA were found in 290 (35%) sera, whereas only 30 (4%) sera had C1q‐fixing DSA. Patients with both class‐I plus ‐II DSA had a 10 yr graft survival of 30% versus 72% in patients without HLA antibodies (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in graft survival between patients with or without C1q‐fixing DSA. Direct comparison of both assays showed that high mean fluorescence intensity values on the pan‐IgG SAB assay are generally related to C1q‐fixation. We conclude that the presence of class‐I plus ‐II IgG DSA as detected by SAB in pretransplant sera of crossmatch negative kidney recipients is indicative for an increased risk for graft failure, whereas the clinical significance of C1q‐fixing IgG‐DSA could not be assessed due to their low prevalence.

The significance of pretransplant donor‐specific antibodies reactive with intact or denatured human leucocyte antigen in kidney transplantation

Antibodies recognizing denatured human leucocyte antigen (HLA) can co‐react with epitopes on intact HLA or recognize cryptic epitopes which are normally unaccessible to HLA antibodies. Their specificity cannot be distinguished by single antigen beads (SAB) alone, as they carry a mixture of intact and denatured HLA. In this study, we selected pretransplant sera containing donor‐specific HLA class I antibodies (DSA) according to regular SAB analysis from 156 kidney transplant recipients. These sera were analysed using a SAB preparation (iBeads) which is largely devoid of denatured HLA class I, and SAB coated with denatured HLA class I antigens. A total of 241 class I DSA were found by regular SAB analysis, of which 152 (63%) were also found by iBeads, whereas 28 (11%) were caused by reactivity with denatured DNA. Patients with DSA defined either by regular SAB or iBeads showed a significantly lower graft survival rate (P = 0·007) compared to those without HLA class I DSA, whereas reactivity to exclusively denatured HLA was not associated with decreased graft survival. In addition, DSA defined by reactivity to class I SAB or class I iBeads occurred more frequently in female patients and in patients with historic HLA sensitization, whereas reactivity to denatured HLA class I was not associated with any of these parameters. Our data suggest that pretransplant donor‐specific antibodies against denatured HLA are clinically irrelevant in patients already sensitized against intact HLA.

The PROCARE consortium: Toward an improved allocation strategy for kidney allografts

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal failure. At present, approximately 800 Dutch patients are registered on the active waiting list of Eurotransplant. The waiting time in the Netherlands for a kidney from a deceased donor is on average between 3 and 4 years. During this period, patients are fully dependent on dialysis, which replaces only partly the renal function, whereas the quality of life is limited. Mortality among patients on the waiting list is high. In order to increase the number of kidney donors, several initiatives have been undertaken by the Dutch Kidney Foundation including national calls for donor registration and providing information on organ donation and kidney transplantation. The aim of the national PROCARE consortium is to develop improved matching algorithms that will lead to a prolonged survival of transplanted donor kidneys and a reduced HLA immunization. The latter will positively affect the waiting time for a retransplantation. The present algorithm for allocation is among others based on matching for HLA antigens, which were originally defined by antibodies using serological typing techniques. However, several studies suggest that this algorithm needs adaptation and that other immune parameters which are currently not included may assist in improving graft survival rates. We will employ a multicenter-based evaluation on 5429 patients transplanted between 1995 and 2005 in the Netherlands. The association between key clinical endpoints and selected laboratory defined parameters will be examined, including Luminex-defined HLA antibody specificities, T and B cell epitopes recognized on the mismatched HLA antigens, non-HLA antibodies, and also polymorphisms in complement and Fc receptors functionally associated with effector functions of anti-graft antibodies. From these data, key parameters determining the success of kidney transplantation will be identified which will lead to the identification of additional parameters to be included in future matching algorithms aiming to extend survival of transplanted kidneys and to diminish HLA immunization. Computer simulation studies will reveal the number of patients having a direct benefit from improved matching, the effect on shortening of the waiting list, and the decrease in waiting time.

Differential effects of donor-specific HLA antibodies in living- versus deceased-donor transplantation.

The presence of donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSAs) is associated with increased risk of graft failure after kidney transplant. We hypothesized that DSAs against HLA class I, class II, or both classes indicate a different risk for graft loss between deceased and living donor transplant. In this study, we investigated the impact of pretransplant DSAs, by using single antigen bead assays, on long‐term graft survival in 3237 deceased and 1487 living donor kidney transplants with a negative complement‐dependent crossmatch. In living donor transplants, we found a limited effect on graft survival of DSAs against class I or II antigens after transplant. Class I and II DSAs combined resulted in decreased 10‐year graft survival (84% to 75%). In contrast, after deceased donor transplant, patients with class I or class II DSAs had a 10‐year graft survival of 59% and 60%, respectively, both significantly lower than the survival for patients without DSAs (76%). The combination of class I and II DSAs resulted in a 10‐year survival of 54% in deceased donor transplants. In conclusion, class I and II DSAs are a clear risk factor for graft loss in deceased donor transplants, while in living donor transplants, class I and II DSAs seem to be associated with an increased risk for graft failure, but this could not be assessed due to their low prevalence.

Pregnancy and fetal outcomes after paternal exposure to azathioprine, methotrexate or mycophenolic acid: a critically appraised topic

A 35-year-old male patient with atopic dermatitis (AD) is being treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). He and his female partner wish to have children. They wonder whether the use of MMF, or any of the other alternative oral immunosuppressive drugs to treat AD, will be a risk for the fetus and whether this medication should be discontinued. He searched on the internet and found that the use of MMF was contraindicated.

Pretransplantation Pharmacokinetic Assessments to Predict Posttransplantation Dosing Requirements in renal Transplant Recipients: What Is Known?

To the Editor: We appreciate the opportunity to respond to “Pretransplantation Pharmacokinetic Assessments to Predict Posttransplantation Dosing Requirements in Renal Transplant Recipients: What Is Known?,” by van Maarseveen and van Zuilen.1 On the basis of published data that show a poor correlation between pre- and posttransplantation tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, the authors doubt that pretransplantation assessment of in vivo CYP3A4 activity might be a promising strategy to predict posttransplantation tacrolimus dose requirements.

Complement Polymorphisms in Kidney Transplantation: Critical in Graft Rejection?

The complement system, as part of the innate immune system, plays an important role in renal transplantation. Complement is involved in the protection against foreign organisms and clearance of apoptotic cells but can also cause injury to the renal allograft, for instance, via antibody binding or in ischemia–reperfusion injury. Numerous polymorphisms in complement factors have been identified thus far; some of them result in different functionalities or alter complement levels. In this review, we provide an overview of the literature on the role of complement polymorphisms in renal transplantation. Furthermore, we discuss functional complement polymorphisms that have not yet been investigated in kidney transplantation. By investigating multiple polymorphisms both in donor and recipient at the same time, a complotype can be constructed. Because the combination of multiple polymorphisms is likely to have a greater impact than a single one, this could provide valuable prognostic information.

Is there an increased risk of cervical neoplasia in atopic dermatitis patients treated with oral immunosuppressive drugs

Oral immunosuppressive drugs are frequently prescribed in young women with atopic dermatitis (AD). Immunocompromised patients may have a higher risk of developing high‐risk HPV infections, cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical carcinoma. Most literature on patients using oral immunosuppressive drugs is available in organ transplant patients. Literature on the risk of developing cervical carcinoma in AD patients treated with oral immunosuppressive drugs is lacking. At this moment, there is no clear guideline/consensus on this topic, but in daily practice, questions arise concerning whether this risk is increased and whether more intensive screening in women using immunosuppressive drugs should take place.